『Just in Case Law』のカバーアート

Just in Case Law

Just in Case Law

著者: Tanya Chapman
無料で聴く

概要

Hear about some of the most interesting Australian legal cases, including deceased estates, forged Wills, financial abuse, divorce and family law disputes, professional and medical negligence, and any other case that has enough drama to be worth discussing. I'm a solicitor specialising in Wills, Estates & Elder Law, so I kinda know what I'm talking about and will try to make it all make sense. This podcast is absolutely not legal advice or a dull legal lecture, but is more a legal soap opera! If you love true crime, but need a break from all the murder, this is the podcast for you!Tanya Chapman ノンフィクション犯罪
エピソード
  • ADMINISTRATIVE: Kids' Kinder
    2026/03/01

    CASE: Kids' Kinder Childcare Pty Limited v The Department of Education [2024] NSWDC 345

    WARNING: Disturbing content; child abuse

    Parents are entitled to expect that when they leave their children at a childcare centre, their children will be properly cared for. That did not occur at Jumpstart Childcare in Menai.

    Kids' Kinder Childcare Pty Limited, operating as Jumpstart Childcare, pleaded guilty to several offences including subjecting children to unreasonable discipline, failing to protect a child from a hazard, and failing to ensure the safety and wellbeing of children at its service.

    After receiving their sentence - an arguably not-so hefty fine - the sole director, Thomas Fanous, appealed against the severity of the sentence. On reviewing the facts, the appeal court agreed that the sentence needed to be appealed, but because it was too lenient and the fine was increased.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    25 分
  • SUCCESSION: Close personal relationship
    2026/02/23

    CASE: Estate MPS, deceased [2017] NSWSC 482; Smoje vForrester [2017] NSWCA 308

    Miryana Smoje spent the last two years of her life dying slowly and in constant pain, from breast cancer and inadequate medical care, in a small hotel room in Frenchs Forest.

    She died without a will and her closest relatives was her brother Neven. But before her estate worth about $2.25m could pass to Neven, there was a claim on the estate.

    David Forrester applied for provision from the estate on the basis that not only had he been Miryana's carer for the last two years of her life, but also because he had been living with her in a close personal relationship at the time of her death.

    Was he successful?

    続きを読む 一部表示
    57 分
  • ELDER LAW: Spink about it
    2026/02/08

    CASE: Flourentzou v Spink [2019] NSWCA 315

    In 2012, Dianne and Mario Flourentzou purchased a property in Casula to live in with their three children.

    Dianne's mother, Ricky Spink, contributed $165,000 towards the purchase and renovation of the Casula property on the understanding that she could live with them at the property for the rest of her life.

    Within 3 years, relationships had soured and Ricky was kicked out of the family home.

    Was there any way she could get her money back?

    続きを読む 一部表示
    50 分
まだレビューはありません