『Just in Case Law』のカバーアート

Just in Case Law

Just in Case Law

著者: Tanya Chapman
無料で聴く

このコンテンツについて

Hear about some of the most interesting Australian legal cases, including deceased estates, forged Wills, financial abuse, divorce and family law disputes, professional and medical negligence, and any other case that has enough drama to be worth discussing. I'm a solicitor specialising in Wills, Estates & Elder Law, so I kinda know what I'm talking about and will try to make it all make sense. This podcast is absolutely not legal advice or a dull legal lecture, but is more a legal soap opera! If you love true crime, but need a break from all the murder, this is the podcast for you!Tanya Chapman ノンフィクション犯罪
エピソード
  • HALLOWEEN SPECIAL
    2025/10/26

    Let's celebrate the best holiday of the year with some funny Halloween legal cases!

    Thanks to Matt, my co-host for this episode <3

    続きを読む 一部表示
    40 分
  • SUCCESSION: Executors can't hide
    2025/10/12

    CASE: Suzanne Dale Smith by her next friend the Public Trustee -v- Marion Kathryn Partridge as executor of the Estate of Thomas Smith [2018] WASC 128

    Marion was the executor of her late father Thomas Smith's estate. In her capacity as executor, she transferred Thomas's house into her name, and held all of the funds in his estate.

    The Court Ordered that Thomas's other daughter, Suzanne, also receive provision from Thomas's estate.

    That's when Marion went to ground. She didn't comply with the Court Orders to pay Suzanne her money.

    Suzanne started new proceedings against Marion, seeking to have Marion removed from the position of executor. Marion was ordered to appear before the Court, but she didn't.

    It is a disturbing thing when the executor uses the law to get all of the deceased's assets and then hides from the responsibilities of that position.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    16 分
  • CIVIL: A busy bookkeeper
    2025/09/21

    CASE: Napier Keen Pty Ltd v Smith [2023] NSWSC 1134

    Beverley was a bookkeeper for the law firm Keen Lawyers for 16 years.

    After Beverley resigned, her boss Mr Keen discovered that Beverley had been taking money from the business. Over a period of 7 years, she siphoned over $1 million from the firm.

    Unfortunately, by the time the theft was discovered, Beverley had lost most of the funds in pokie machines.

    The firm sued not only Beverley, but also her partner Gregory. Although Gregory was not involved the the thefts and had no knowledge of them, the firm wanted him to be liable to repay them then stolen funds.

    Can a spouse be financially liable for what the money their partner steals?

    続きを読む 一部表示
    28 分
まだレビューはありません