エピソード

  • Jeffrey Epstein And His Alleged Leverage Against Prince Andrew

    Jeffrey Epstein And His Alleged Leverage Against Prince Andrew
    2025/08/28
    Newly unsealed court filings from Virginia Giuffre’s civil case have raised questions about whether Jeffrey Epstein may have leveraged incriminating material to exert influence over Prince Andrew. During Epstein’s deposition under oath, he refused to answer whether he intended to obtain blackmail-worthy information on the Duke of York after Giuffre’s alleged encounter with him—choosing instead to invoke his Fifth Amendment right. Giuffre herself testified that Epstein required her to report in detail about the encounter, including whether Prince Andrew had “thanked” Epstein for arranging it—a line of questioning that suggests Epstein might have been cultivating compromising content.


    Despite these indications, a recent exhaustive review by the FBI and Department of Justice concluded that they found no credible evidence of a “client list” or a blackmail scheme involving Epstein and prominent individuals—including Prince Andrew. A memo released last month reaffirmed that the investigation found nothing actionable that would warrant further scrutiny or charges against third parties such as Prince Andrew.



    to contact me:


    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    Source:


    https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/12404386/jeffrey-epstein-something-on-prince-andrew-documentary/
    続きを読む 一部表示
    16 分
  • How Jeffrey Epstein Circumvented Title 31 Laws (8/27/25)

    How Jeffrey Epstein Circumvented Title 31 Laws (8/27/25)
    2025/08/28
    Title 31 of the U.S. Code mandates banks to conduct due diligence on high-value accounts and timely report suspicious transactions via Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs). In Epstein’s case, investigations reveal that major banks—like JPMorgan Chase and Deutsche Bank—processed vast and unusual transactions tied to him with significant delays or not at all. Senator Ron Wyden cited internal bank records showing one bank flagged more than $170 million flowing to Epstein, but only reported it seven years late, long after Epstein's death in 2019. SARs involving installments up to $100 million and Russian-linked wire transfers reportedly went undisclosed or underreported, suggesting systemic circumvention of Title 31 requirements.


    These failures weren’t just clerical missteps—they represented institutional lapses in AML enforcement. Deutsche Bank was fined $150 million in 2020 for ignoring red flags and maintaining numerous Epstein-linked accounts well into 2019, despite clear indicators of his illicit activities. Compliance officers reportedly raised concerns, only to be overridden by bank executives, allowing Epstein’s atypical cash movements and hidden financial networks to persist unchallenged until after media scrutiny intensified.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/brutal-rebuke-of-deutsche-bank-raises-serious-questions-about-one-of-jeffrey-epsteins-lawyers/
    続きを読む 一部表示
    17 分
  • Is The FBI Hiding Key Details Of Their Alleged Relationship With Jeffrey Epstein? (8/27/25)

    Is The FBI Hiding Key Details Of Their Alleged Relationship With Jeffrey Epstein? (8/27/25)
    2025/08/27
    Federal agencies, including the FBI and the Department of Justice, have faced mounting criticism for withholding significant portions of Epstein-related records—fueling allegations of a deliberate cover-up. In July 2025, both agencies issued a memo stating they found no “client list,” no proof of blackmail, and no evidence Epstein was murdered, and confirmed his death was a suicide. They also announced they would not release further documents, despite earlier promises of transparency 

    The limited release of roughly 33,000 pages—largely consisting of materials already public—was blasted by lawmakers and victims’ advocates as inadequate. Critics argued the disclosures fell far short of real accountability, with Rep. Robert Garcia and others calling the process a “stonewall.” Independent reviews, such as Just Security’s detailed timeline, underscored repeated federal failures: ignoring victim reports, dropping early investigations, and negotiating Epstein’s lenient 2008 non-prosecution agreement in secret. Together, these actions suggest a systemic effort to obscure the extent of Epstein’s government ties rather than expose them.

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    https://www.dailywire.com/news/fbi-hiding-potentially-explosive-records-on-jeffrey-epstein-internet-sleuth-claims-after-foia-denial
    続きを読む 一部表示
    15 分
  • The Ghislaine Maxwell Tapes: Transcripts From Ghislaine Maxwell DOJ Interview (Part 10) (8/27/25)

    The Ghislaine Maxwell Tapes: Transcripts From Ghislaine Maxwell DOJ Interview (Part 10) (8/27/25)
    2025/08/27
    On August 22, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice released redacted transcripts and audio recordings of a two-day interview it conducted in July with Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year federal prison sentence for her role in Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking ring. During the interview, Maxwell denied ever seeing any inappropriate behavior by former President Donald Trump, describing him as a “gentleman in all respects,” and insisted she “never witnessed the president in any inappropriate setting in any way.” She also rejected the existence of a so-called “client list,” countering years of speculation, and claimed to have no knowledge of blackmail or illicit recordings tied to Epstein.

    In addition to defending high-profile figures, Maxwell expressed doubt that Epstein’s death was a suicide, while also rejecting the notion of an elaborate conspiracy or murder plot. The release of the transcripts—handled under the Trump-era Justice Department—has stirred sharp political debate. Trump allies have framed her remarks as vindication, while critics and Epstein’s survivors question her credibility, pointing to her conviction and suggesting her words may be aimed at influencing potential clemency or political favor.


    to contact me:


    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:


    Interview Transcript - Maxwell 2025.07.24 (Redacted).pdf
    続きを読む 一部表示
    15 分
  • The Ghislaine Maxwell Tapes: Transcripts From Ghislaine Maxwell DOJ Interview (Part 9) (8/26/25)

    The Ghislaine Maxwell Tapes: Transcripts From Ghislaine Maxwell DOJ Interview (Part 9) (8/26/25)
    2025/08/27
    On August 22, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice released redacted transcripts and audio recordings of a two-day interview it conducted in July with Ghislaine Maxwell, who is serving a 20-year federal prison sentence for her role in Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking ring. During the interview, Maxwell denied ever seeing any inappropriate behavior by former President Donald Trump, describing him as a “gentleman in all respects,” and insisted she “never witnessed the president in any inappropriate setting in any way.” She also rejected the existence of a so-called “client list,” countering years of speculation, and claimed to have no knowledge of blackmail or illicit recordings tied to Epstein.

    In addition to defending high-profile figures, Maxwell expressed doubt that Epstein’s death was a suicide, while also rejecting the notion of an elaborate conspiracy or murder plot. The release of the transcripts—handled under the Trump-era Justice Department—has stirred sharp political debate. Trump allies have framed her remarks as vindication, while critics and Epstein’s survivors question her credibility, pointing to her conviction and suggesting her words may be aimed at influencing potential clemency or political favor.


    to contact me:


    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:


    Interview Transcript - Maxwell 2025.07.24 (Redacted).pdf
    続きを読む 一部表示
    13 分
  • Spay Day Or Deposition: The DOJ And Their White Gloved Chat With Ghislaine Maxwell (Part 2) (8/27/25)

    Spay Day Or Deposition: The DOJ And Their White Gloved Chat With Ghislaine Maxwell (Part 2) (8/27/25)
    2025/08/27
    The DOJ’s transcripts with Ghislaine Maxwell read less like a deposition and more like a polite coffee chat, with Todd Blanche treating a convicted trafficker as if she were a misunderstood guest instead of a predator. Rather than pressing her for truth, the exchanges gave Maxwell space to “set the record straight,” validating her narrative and laundering her image into something official. The tone was soft, deferential, and absurd — serving not to expose corruption but to protect it, wrapping the cover-up in the illusion of accountability. Survivors were left silenced while Maxwell was gifted the spotlight, turning justice into propaganda.

    Worse still, many in the media and commentary class framed this transcript as a form of closure. Podcasters, influencers, and columnists repeated the DOJ’s narrative with an air of finality, presenting Maxwell’s statements as meaningful contributions to the record. They highlighted her composure, spoke of nuance, and positioned the exchange as a step forward. In practice, this served less as analysis and more as amplification of a managed script. By portraying the transcript as progress, these voices reinforced the perception that the matter was resolved, when in reality it functioned only to shield institutions, minimize scrutiny, and reframe a cover-up as resolution.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    続きを読む 一部表示
    11 分
  • Spay Day Or Deposition: The DOJ And Their White Gloved Chat With Ghislaine Maxwell (Part 1) (8/27/25)

    Spay Day Or Deposition: The DOJ And Their White Gloved Chat With Ghislaine Maxwell (Part 1) (8/27/25)
    2025/08/27
    The DOJ’s transcripts with Ghislaine Maxwell read less like a deposition and more like a polite coffee chat, with Todd Blanche treating a convicted trafficker as if she were a misunderstood guest instead of a predator. Rather than pressing her for truth, the exchanges gave Maxwell space to “set the record straight,” validating her narrative and laundering her image into something official. The tone was soft, deferential, and absurd — serving not to expose corruption but to protect it, wrapping the cover-up in the illusion of accountability. Survivors were left silenced while Maxwell was gifted the spotlight, turning justice into propaganda.

    Worse still, many in the media and commentary class framed this transcript as a form of closure. Podcasters, influencers, and columnists repeated the DOJ’s narrative with an air of finality, presenting Maxwell’s statements as meaningful contributions to the record. They highlighted her composure, spoke of nuance, and positioned the exchange as a step forward. In practice, this served less as analysis and more as amplification of a managed script. By portraying the transcript as progress, these voices reinforced the perception that the matter was resolved, when in reality it functioned only to shield institutions, minimize scrutiny, and reframe a cover-up as resolution.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    続きを読む 一部表示
    12 分
  • Morning Update: Prince Andrew Prepares For A Brand New Epstein Storm To Come Rolling In (8/27/25)

    Morning Update: Prince Andrew Prepares For A Brand New Epstein Storm To Come Rolling In (8/27/25)
    2025/08/27
    A memoir titled Nobody’s Girl: A Memoir of Surviving Abuse and Fighting for Justice, written by Virginia Roberts Giuffre with journalist Amy Wallace, is scheduled for posthumous release on October 21, 2025, from Alfred A. Knopf (with Penguin Random House involved in audio and ebook editions). The 400‑page manuscript was completed prior to Giuffre’s death by suicide in April 2025, and she had conveyed—via an email to Wallace dated April 1—that it was her “heartfelt wish” for the book to be published regardless of the outcome. Publishers describe the memoir as an unsparing and powerful narrative of trafficking, abuse, and survival, rigorously fact-checked and legally vetted, aimed at spotlighting systemic failures in human trafficking enforcement and championing justice and awareness.


    Of particular note, Nobody’s Girl includes “intimate, disturbing, and heartbreaking new details” about Giuffre’s experiences with Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and other high-profile individuals—including Britain's Prince Andrew. This marks her first public discussion of Andrew since their 2022 out-of-court settlement, which reportedly involved a multi-million‑dollar payment. In doing so, the memoir is expected to reignite scrutiny and media attention on the allegations Andrew has long denied, resurrecting his central role in a scandal many believed had faded from the headlines.


    to contact me:


    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




    source:

    Prince Andrew struggling as Virginia Giuffre memoir set for release: expert | Fox News
    続きを読む 一部表示
    18 分