『Cryptocurrency Case Law Review』のカバーアート

Cryptocurrency Case Law Review

Cryptocurrency Case Law Review

著者: Sam Jameson
無料で聴く

今ならプレミアムプランが3カ月 月額99円

2026年5月12日まで。4か月目以降は月額1,500円で自動更新します。

概要

A podcast for legal professionals about cryptocurrency litigation. Each episode, learn about a new legal case that considered cryptocurrency evidence - the arguments presented, and the issues considered by the court. Law is local, but cryptocurrency is borderless. The Crypto Case Law Review brings critical international judgments from across the globe directly to your earbuds. Each episode answers questions like: - How is cryptocurrency expert evidence presented and challenged? - What duty of care exists for VASPs in crypto scams? - Do stablecoins like USDT and USDC attract property rights in various jurisdictions? - What do courts expect with tracing methodology, clustering, and attribution? Stay ahead of the curve with concise, high-powered case briefs for the modern litigator. 経済学
エピソード
  • Trailer - Cryptocurrency Case Law Review
    2026/03/26
    When cryptocurrency evidence enters the courtroom, the side that controls the technical narrative wins. Cryptocurrency evidence means dealing with untested technology, millions of dollars on the line, and a legal environment being rewritten in real-time. Welcome to the Cryptocurrency Case Law Review the podcast for legal professionals engaged in cryptocurrency litigation. Law is practiced locally, but cryptocurrency is borderless. Whether you are an Associate drafting a freezing order or a Litigation Partner assessing the strategic risk of a cross-border dispute, this show is your competitive edge. What to Expect: In each episode, we extract key lessons from a recent crypto-related litigation, bringing you judgments from the USA, UK, Australia, Hong Kong, and beyond. Upcoming Topics Include: - Deconstructing failed blockchain tracing methodologies. - The specific evidentiary thresholds required for on-chain clustering. - Strategic and reputational risks of presenting unverified forensic data in court. - How global courts are ruling on freezing orders and stablecoin property rights. Hit "Follow" or "Subscribe" today so you don't miss our premiere episode.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    2 分
  • Can a 'Click-Wrap' Warning Discharge a VASP's Duty of Care?
    2026/04/12
    How can a VASP prove it did "enough" to prevent a user from falling victim to a scam? This episode examines Xu v. NDAX Canada, a case in which expert evidence and internal risk metrics helped a VASP avoid an adverse judgment. We explore the "four-stage warning protocol" and discuss why a court described a plaintiff as the "author of her own misfortune." For litigation partners managing risk, and associates drafting defense motions, this case brief offers lessons in building a robust standard of care defense in the face of sophisticated crypto-asset fraud. About the Case Case Name: Xu v. NDAX Canada (2025 BCSC 2048) Jurisdiction: Canada Court: Supreme Court of British Columbia Date: April 2025 Read the Judgment https://www.bccourts.ca/jdb-txt/sc/25/20/2025BCSC2048.htm Topics Explored - Deconstructing the plaintiff's failed negligence argument in the BC Supreme Court. - The evidentiary weight given to "Know Your Transaction" (KYT) scoring. - Proactive warnings vs. automated pop-ups: How did they contribute to legal "immunity"? - The danger of ignoring a customer’s "insistence" to trade during a scam. - Procedural tips for discovering and presenting internal VASP risk logs. This Episode was Sponsored by Captura Cyber Captura Cyber brings clarity to cryptocurrency litigation by providing cryptocurrency expert reports and specialist cryptocurrency investigation for plaintiffs as well as expert rebuttal reports to challenge the methodology of opposing expert evidence for defendants. Their cryptocurrency expert witnesses - drawn from Law Enforcement, Academia, and Industry - ensure cryptocurrency expert reports are authoritative and admissible.. Schedule a consultation at www.capturacyber.com Legal Disclaimer The Cryptocurrency Case Law Review podcast is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Listening to this podcast or accessing our show notes does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please note that the discussions featured in these episodes use synthetic, AI-generated voices to review and analyse past legal judgments. Always consult with qualified legal counsel regarding your specific case or jurisdiction.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    9 分
まだレビューはありません