Humanists International Answer Your Questions
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
概要
Sign up for the Humanists International Newsletter
To mark the end of Season One, Gary and Leon are joined by Harry, Fundraising and Communications Officer at Humanists International, who hosts a special listener Q&A. Questions came in from around the world covering everything from digital safety under repressive regimes, to the future of the UN, to humanism's role in the age of AI and climate change.
In this episode we cover
- How humanists living under restrictive regimes can stay safe and connected — and what Humanists International can offer
- The Freedom of Thought Report — greatest improvements and worst declines over the past decade
- Humanism, climate change and AI — can humanists help shape the story humanity tells about itself?
- Concerns about the direction of UN reform and what it means for human rights funding and civil society
- How Humanists International sets its priorities, how it is governed, and how it is financed
Further reading and references
- Humanists International casework and security resources: https://humanists.international/what-we-do/
- Frontline Defenders — security support for human rights defenders: https://www.frontlinedefenders.org
- Luxembourg Declaration on Artificial Intelligence — Humanists International: https://humanists.international/policy/luxembourg-declaration-on-artificial-intelligence-and-human-values/
- UN80 Initiative — reform framework: https://www.un.org/en/un80
Follow Humanist International
- Sign up for our free Newsletter
- Support Humanists International
- Follow our Campaigns
- About - Humanists International
- Join us at the World Humanists Congress 2026
This podcast is produced by Humanise Live.
Start your podcast today, visit: humanise.live
🎶Music: Horizon by Simon Folwar
Podcast transcripts are AI-generated and may contain errors or omissions. They are provided to make our content more accessible, but should not be considered a fully accurate record of the conversation.