Peter and Andrew dig into Paul Thomas Anderson’s epic There Will Be Blood, exploring Daniel Day-Lewis’s towering performance as oilman Daniel Plainview and the film’s unflinching look at ambition, greed, and the dark side of the American dream. They analyze the film’s wordless opening, its complex father-son dynamic, and the explosive rivalry between Plainview and preacher Eli Sunday.

In their remake scenarios, they tackle a cinematic challenge: How do you adapt a sprawling character study? Could it work as a family film from HW’s perspective? What would a no-budget version focus on? Would it be better as a prestige TV series or a limited Netflix run?

The hosts also share their current viewing habits, including It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia and The Smashing Machine, while referencing All Is Lost, Land Man, and Yellowstone in their discussion.

Topics covered: Visual storytelling, the cost of ambition, American capitalism, the myth of the self-made man, and why some films are more rewarding on repeat viewings.

Peter and Andrew break down Sidney Lumet’s 1957 classic 12 Angry Men, exploring how this single-room drama became a timeless lesson in justice, persuasion, and American democracy. They analyze the film’s unique approach to character development, its allegorical power, and why it’s still shown in law schools and psychology classes today.

In their remake scenarios, they tackle a contained challenge: How do you make a jury room drama family-friendly? Could it work as a school disciplinary board story? What would a no-budget or Rashomon-style version look like? Would it be better as a modern TV series or a grand jury procedural?

The hosts also share their current viewing habits, including Withnail & I and The Rip, while referencing A Few Good Men, The Social Network, Runaway Jury, Juror #2, and Jury Duty in their analysis.

Topics covered: Group psychology, the presumption of innocence, contained storytelling, the evolution of jury dramas, and why some classics are more important than entertaining.

Peter and Andrew tackle Alfred Hitchcock's 1958 psychological thriller Vertigo, exploring why critics have called it the greatest film ever made. They analyze Jimmy Stewart's obsessive detective, the film's groundbreaking camera techniques, and whether this complex meditation on identity and control works better as art than entertainment. Plus, they debate if it's even really a detective story at all.

In their remake scenarios, they face a psychological puzzle: How do you adapt Hitchcock's most personal film? Could it work as a school-based family drama? What would a no-budget version focus on? Would it be better as a series exploring obsession over multiple episodes?

The hosts also share their current viewing habits, including Gail Daughtry and the Celebrity Sex Pass from Sundance and Sicario, while referencing Rear Window, Psycho, Rope, North by Northwest, Shutter Island, Anatomy of a Fall, and various Hitchcock classics in their analysis.

Topics covered: The famous "vertigo shot" technique, Hitchcock's approach to mystery vs. psychology, Jimmy Stewart's darker roles, whether critics overrate experimental films, and why some movies work better as museum pieces

Peter and Andrew examine Damien Chazelle's intense 2014 drama Whiplash, exploring the toxic relationship between an ambitious young drummer and his abusive instructor. They analyze J.K. Simmons' powerhouse performance, discuss whether the film glorifies or condemns abusive teaching methods, and examine how this "sports movie set in music" captures the pursuit of greatness at any cost.

In their remake scenarios, they face a contained challenge: How do you adapt a two-person psychological thriller? Could it work as a family-friendly animated film? What would change in a no-budget version of an already low-budget movie? Would expanding it to a TV series dilute its intensity?

The hosts also share their current viewing habits, including Fallout and Train Dreams, while referencing Vision Quest, The Pit, Scrubs, La La Land, Babylon, First Man, and Fox Catcher in their discussion.

Topics covered: The ethics of extreme teaching methods, sports movie structure in other genres, the pursuit of perfection vs. personal cost, accuracy in specialized fields, and whether great art requires suffering.

Peter and Andrew examine Joseph Mankiewicz's 1950 masterpiece All About Eve, exploring how this dialogue-driven drama about ambition and betrayal in the theater world remains timelessly relevant. They analyze the film's sharp wit, discuss the legendary performances that earned four female Oscar nominations, and examine how the story's themes of aging, power, and manipulation transcend its Broadway setting.

In their remake scenarios, they tackle a structural challenge: How do you update a dialogue-heavy classic? Could it work as a High School Musical-style family film? What would a no-budget version focus on? Would it work better as a modern TV series exploring social media fame versus traditional Hollywood? Plus, they discuss the film's influence on countless imitators.

The hosts also share their current viewing habits, including Dumb and Dumber and Avatar: Fire and Ash, while referencing May December, Saltburn, Braveheart, Mean Girls, Showgirls, The Substance, and various backstage dramas in their analysis.

Topics covered: Broadway vs. Hollywood prestige, the evolution of female roles in cinema, dialogue-driven storytelling, the cyclical nature of fame and replacement, and Greek myths.

Peter and Andrew explore Hayao Miyazaki's 2001 animated masterpiece Spirited Away, examining how it captures the essence of childhood through a young girl's journey in a magical spirit world. They discuss Miyazaki's unique animation style, the film's approach to fairy tale darkness, and why it resonates differently with audiences depending on their familiarity with Studio Ghibli's storytelling approach.

In their remake scenarios, they face a creative challenge: How do you adapt pure imagination? Could it work as a live-action horror film? What would a no-budget costume version look like? Would it be better as a TV series exploring the bathhouse world? Plus, they debate whether some films are too uniquely personal to remake.

The hosts also share their current viewing habits, including Marty Supreme and The Running Man, while referencing My Neighbor Totoro, Howl's Moving Castle, Pan's Labyrinth, Alice in Wonderland, Hansel and Gretel, Zootopia, Fantasia, Princess Bride, and various Miyazaki classics in their discussion.

Peter and Andrew explore Francis Ford Coppola's ambitious 1974 sequel The Godfather Part II, analyzing its groundbreaking dual timeline structure that tells both Vito's rise and Michael's fall. They discuss whether this complex narrative experiment improves on the original, examine Robert De Niro's performance as young Vito, and debate why the film feels more like a meditation on power than a traditional sequel.

In their remake scenarios, they tackle a structural puzzle: How do you adapt a three-hour epic with two storylines? Could the Vito story work as a standalone family film? What would a no-budget version focus on? Would it be better as a Netflix series exploring each timeline separately?

The hosts also share their current viewing habits, including 2046 by Wong Kar-wai and the latest Knives Out film Wake Up Dead Man, while referencing Chunking Express, In the Mood for Love, Eternity, Defending Your Life, Stalker, The Sopranos, Succession, The Young Indiana Jones Chronicles, and various crime epics in their analysis.

Topics covered: Sequel vs. prequel storytelling, the rise and fall narrative structure, Italian-American family dynamics, does complex always mean better

Peter and Andrew tackle Francis Ford Coppola's 1972 masterpiece The Godfather, exploring why it's widely considered the greatest film ever made. They analyze the film's unique structure following Michael's transformation, discuss Marlon Brando's iconic performance, and examine how the movie merges pulpy crime action with profound themes about family, power, and the American Dream.

In their remake scenarios, they face their most ambitious challenge: How do you remake perfection? Could it work as a family farm drama? What would a no-budget version focus on? Would it be better as a prestige TV series?

Plus, they celebrate their 10th episode with special awards for their favorite films so far. The hosts also share their current viewing habits, including Full House and Roofman, while referencing The Godfather Part II, Succession, The Sopranos, King Lear, The Freshman, Identity Thief, The Outfit, Shark Tales, and various crime classics in their discussion and 10-episode retrospective.

Topics covered: Perfect screenplay structure, Italian-American representation, the corruption of power, family loyalty vs. moral compromise, and what makes a film objectively great versus personally meaningful.