Housing Sector Podcast #62 Window Replacement & Safety Concerns - Guildford Borough Council
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
概要
In this episode of the Housing Sector Podcast, I speak with Jane Hill, a long-term leaseholder, and Morley Young, a former third-party technical consultant, about a window replacement programme involving Guildford Borough Council.
What began as a routine planned upgrade became, according to those involved, a deeply distressing experience for the resident concerned. The discussion covers what Jane and Morley say happened during the works, including concerns around safety, health impacts, specification of materials, internal decision-making, and how the situation was handled once problems were identified.
Jane describes the impact the works had on her home and wellbeing, while Morley explains why he raised concerns when he was brought in to assess the situation. This includes issues relating to health and safety processes, asbestos risk management, and whether the works being carried out matched the specification provided to leaseholders.
The episode also explores what followed: the halting and restarting of works, subsequent damage, charging concerns, and the ongoing complaint now with the Housing Ombudsman. More broadly, it raises questions about oversight, accountability, and how residents are protected when major works go wrong.
This episode is presented as part one. A follow-up episode will examine developments once the Housing Ombudsman process has concluded and will include any further response provided by the council.
Important context and clarification
This episode presents the personal accounts and opinions of those involved. Any references to illegality, negligence, or misconduct reflect the views and experiences described by the speakers and are contested. They should not be taken as findings of fact or legal conclusions.
Right to reply – Guildford Borough Council
Guildford Borough Council was contacted ahead of publication and offered a right to reply. The council provided the following response:
“Thank you for your enquiry. Below is our factual response.
Two previously published independent reports – the Heminsley Law report and the SOLACE report, provide factual analysis and narrative into our historic housing repairs. Our improvement plans set out what we are doing to address the issues raised in these reports. The Independent Assurance Panel has reported twice on our progress, and their reports have been published as part of our journey to improvement.
We understand that Mr & Mrs Hill have contacted the Housing Ombudsman and therefore it is not appropriate for us to provide further comment.”
Referenced reports and material
In their response, Guildford Borough Council referred to previously published reports and improvement documentation. For transparency, links are provided below:
https://democracy.guildford.gov.uk/documents/s38003/Item+11+1+-+App+1+-+Heminsley+Law+Report.pdf
https://democracy.guildford.gov.uk/documents/s32854/Item%2003%201%20-%20Corporate%20Improvement%20Plan%20-%20App%201%20-%20SOLACE%20Report%20March%2024.pdf
https://www.guildford.gov.uk/article/27169/Our-journey-to-improvement
These documents relate to historic governance and housing repairs issues referenced by the council. They do not address the specific resident experience discussed in this episode.
The council did not address the specific questions raised in the episode and said it would not comment further while the matter is under consideration by the Housing Ombudsman.
#HousingSector #HousingSectorPodcast #SocialHousing #Leaseholders #Section20 #MajorWorks #WindowReplacement #BuildingSafety #ResidentVoices #Accountability #LocalGovernment #Guildford #HousingOmbudsman #HousingStandards
Support the show