『Frequency』のカバーアート

Frequency

Frequency

著者: Chuck Gose & Jenni Field
無料で聴く

今ならプレミアムプランが3カ月 月額99円

2026年5月12日まで。4か月目以降は月額1,500円で自動更新します。

概要

Frequency is where internal comms, HR, leadership and employee experience come together with lively conversation, expert insights, and plenty of friendly debate. Hosted by industry firestarters Chuck Gose and Jenni Field, this podcast tackles the big workplace challenges—from reaching frontline employees to shaping a strong company culture—all with a mix of sharp opinions, candid stories, and discussion.

Chuck and Jenni bring their unique perspectives and personalities to every episode, ensuring you get more than just the usually-tedious industry insights. Whether it’s sparking new ideas or challenging the status quo, Frequency is the conversation you didn’t know you needed.

Tune in for a weekly dose of everything you need to know about leadership, workplace culture and employee engagement.

a3cffaee93e954f93bbedfafc22bc42959cf432bCopyright 2025 All rights reserved.
経済学
エピソード
  • 21% Trust Leaders: Kano's Fix, Ineffective Meetings & the Root of Psychological Safety
    2026/04/06

    From the science behind psychological safety to a product development model being applied to the trust crisis, via the ongoing debate about whether meetings count as real work, this is an episode full of practical frameworks and direct perspectives.

    Jenni opens the conversation by exploring the Eat Sleep Work Repeat podcast, hosted by Bruce Daisley, which features Professor Katrien Franzen and her research on leadership and social identity. The central insight is the concept of "we-ness" — the idea that without a genuine sense of team belonging, psychological safety simply cannot take hold. Professor Franzen's research identifies four distinct leadership roles: task leader, motivational leader, social leader, and external leader. Jenni and Chuck examine whether it is realistic to expect formal leaders to embody all four.

    The conversation turns to a Fortune article reporting that business leaders are raising the alarm over meeting culture, with Southwest Airlines CEO Bob Jordan among the latest to speak out. Nearly 80% of workers say they are drowning in meetings, and an Atlassian study of 5,000 workers across four continents found that 72% of meetings are deemed ineffective.

    Shell Holtz's recent LinkedIn article introduces a framework that applies the Kano model — developed by Professor Noriaki Kano in the 1980s for product management — to the challenge of rebuilding employee trust. The context makes the framework all the more urgent: Gallup data shows only 21% of US employees strongly agree they trust their organisation's leadership, and the Edelman Trust Barometer has recorded its first global decline in employee trust in the study's 26-year history.

    Jenni closes the episode with a look at the UK's Best Workplaces 2026 list. The numbers behind the list make the case compellingly: UK best workplaces perform more than four times better than the market and generate 6.25 times greater revenue per employee. Chuck raises a fair challenge about the nature of paid-for lists and the many great workplaces that simply are not on them, while Jenni argues that for internal comms and HR professionals the more productive question is: what are these organisations doing to build the trust that sits behind these results, and what can we learn from them?

    Articles mentioned in this episode:

    • Nike CEO vents to employees
    • Eat Sleep Work Repeat: We-ness: The secret cause of Psychological Safety
    • Meetings are not work
    • The trust recession
    • Best places to work in the UK 2026

    Want to find out more about Chuck’s work and ICology - check out the website and how to become a member here: https://www.joinicology.com/

    Jenni’s a regular speaker and consultant on leadership credibility and internal communication, you can find out more about how to learn from her and work with her here: https://thejennifield.com/

    続きを読む 一部表示
    30 分
  • 60% Want a Layoff: Career Dysmorphia, AI Brain Fry & the Reciprocity Gap
    2026/03/30

    In Episode 50, Jenni Field and Chuck Gose are back together — Jenni returning from a trip to Japan and Chuck recording live from Las Vegas during Transform — to dig into four stories shaping the future of work, careers, and our relationship with AI.

    The first story explores what's being called "career dysmorphia," with nearly six in ten millennial workers privately hoping for a layoff rather than choosing to leave on their own. A survey of 2,000 Gen Z and millennial workers found 37% dissatisfied with their roles and 55% unsettled in their careers. Jenni pushes back on the idea that this is purely a workplace problem, arguing it's really about personal agency. Chuck adds that with AI eliminating entry-level roles and 76% of HR professionals surveyed expecting significant hiring reductions, Gen Z may arrive to find there's no ladder at all.

    The second story looks at women in their 40s and 50s leaving corporate roles in growing numbers — not because of burnout, but because, as McKinsey researcher Lareina Yee frames it, it's the absence of reciprocity. Chuck notes that the true cost of these departures — estimated at up to 213% of salary — still fails to capture the ripple effect on the teams left behind. Jenni connects RTO mandates as the tipping point, the straw that breaks the camel's back after years of consistently poor leadership behaviours stacking up.

    The third story centres on Anthropic's study of nearly 81,000 Claude users across 159 countries and 70 languages — described as the largest and most multilingual qualitative study ever conducted on AI. Jenni and Chuck explore the striking geographic divide, with workers in lower- and middle-income countries far more optimistic about AI than those in Western Europe and North America, and question whether the dominant Western mindset of efficiency and productivity is a form of greed compared to the learning and opportunity lens seen elsewhere.

    The fourth story introduces "AI brain fry" — a term coined by a Harvard Business Review study from BCG researcher Gabriella Rosen Kellerman — describing a specific form of cognitive overload from maintaining constant oversight of AI output, already affecting 14% of US workers. Jenni draws a sharp parallel to the long-established research on multitasking, questioning whether this is truly a new phenomenon or simply the same cognitive limits colliding with a tool of unprecedented scale. Chuck's advice to comms teams: be open, share your workflows, and talk to your manager — because the teams doing that are measurably reducing fatigue and doing better.

    Articles mentioned in this episode:

    • Millennials Don't Want to Quit. They Want to Get Laid Off.
    • You're Not Burnt Out. You're Done.
    • What 81,000 People Want from AI
    • AI Brain Fry

    Want to find out more about Chuck's work and ICology — check out the website and how to become a member here: https://www.joinicology.com/

    Jenni's a regular speaker and consultant on leadership credibility and internal communication. Find out more about how to learn from her and work with her here: https://thejennifield.com/

    続きを読む 一部表示
    35 分
  • Uber CEO Will Push You Out, Cracker Barrel's Leaked Memo Backfires & 67% of HR Pros Have No Career Path
    2026/03/23
    Jenni Field is away this week, so Chuck Gose goes solo covering four stories that all, in different ways, come back to the same question: what does leadership actually communicate about how much it values its people? Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi went on The Diary of a CEO podcast and said the quiet part loud: he expects immediate responses to weekend emails, doesn't talk about work-life balance at Uber, and will push employees out if they can't keep pace. Chuck isn't entirely unsympathetic — there's something genuinely useful about a leader who names the culture explicitly rather than letting unspoken norms do the damage quietly. The problem is the contradiction. Claiming flexibility while expecting Saturday email responses at 9:30pm is doing a lot of heavy lifting. Chuck draws the contrast with Linear CEO Karri Saarinen, who has deliberately built a 40-hour-week culture around quality over speed. The question isn't which CEO is right. It's whether employees at either company actually know what they're signing up for. Cracker Barrel made headlines when a leaked internal memo instructed employees to eat at Cracker Barrel restaurants for most meals during business travel, with alcohol no longer reimbursable without senior pre-approval. Chuck's take: the policy is largely unremarkable. SAP Concur named this exact trend "travelscrimping" in their 2025 Global Business Travel Survey. What made it a story was the absence of proactive framing — a two-year-old policy became a crisis because it leaked without context. The real communication failure wasn't the policy. It was letting a leaked memo define the narrative first. And in a company still recovering from a $100 million rebrand reversal, that trust deficit made the pile-on predictable. The frontline workforce gets the most substantive treatment of the episode. Chuck walks through a Fortune op-ed by Stacey Zolt Hara of Burson, anchored by former United Airlines CEO Oscar Munoz and his framework for operational excellence: focus on the person holding the wrench. Munoz is credited with turning around a deeply disgruntled 85,000-person workforce by making frontline workers the centrepiece of the culture rebuild. The data backing the argument is striking — 87% of frontline workers aren't sure whether company culture applies to them at all, and a 2025 Aspen Institute study found U.S. GDP would be 10% higher if the essential economy had kept pace with white-collar productivity growth. Chuck flags that the article is a Burson op-ed — a comms firm making the case for comms investment — but doesn't let that undermine the substance. And he notes the harder truth behind the How Institute's finding that 94% of employees say moral leadership matters, but only 6% of CEOs deliver it: the problem isn't awareness. It's that incentive structures don't reward it. The episode closes with a story that lands closer to home — a survey from the HR Certification Institute finding that 67% of HR practitioners have no clear or well-defined career path, and 41% are considering leaving the profession entirely. Chuck calls it less an irony than an indictment: the function responsible for career frameworks, succession planning, and leadership pipelines for everyone else hasn't applied any of that to itself. The structural problems are architectural — flat hierarchies, lean teams, subjective promotions — and people analytics as a career differentiator is realistic only for the top 15-20% of practitioners who sit inside data-mature organisations. Chuck closes with a thread that connects back to the Munoz story: HR practitioners are their own version of the guy with the wrench. Essential to the operation. Excluded from conversations about their own futures. Want to find out more about Chuck's work and ICology — check out the website and how to become a member here: https://www.joinicology.com/ Jenni's a regular speaker and consultant on leadership credibility and internal communication. Find out more about how to learn from her and work with her here: https://thejennifield.com/ Articles mentioned in this episode: Uber CEO Says Hard Work Is "the Most Important Skill in Life" — and He'll Push You Out If You Can't Keep Up Cracker Barrel Tells Employees to Eat at Cracker Barrel on Work Trips To Unlock Employee Effort, Don't Overlook the Person Holding the Wrench HR Is Supposed to Design Career Paths. So Why Are Its Own So Unclear?
    続きを読む 一部表示
    19 分
まだレビューはありません