『FedSoc Forums』のカバーアート

FedSoc Forums

FedSoc Forums

著者： The Federalist Society
無料で聴く

*This series was formerly known as Teleforums.

FedSoc Forums is a virtual discussion series dedicated to providing expert analysis and intellectual commentary on today’s most pressing legal and policy issues. Produced by The Federalist Society’s Practice Groups, FedSoc Forum strives to create balanced conversations in various formats, such as monologues, debates, or panel discussions. In addition to regular episodes, FedSoc Forum features special content covering specific topics in the legal world, such as:

  • Courthouse Steps: A series of rapid response discussions breaking down all the latest SCOTUS cases after oral argument or final decision
  • A Seat at the Sitting: A monthly series that runs during the Court’s term featuring a panel of constitutional experts discussing the Supreme Court’s upcoming docket sitting by sitting
  • Litigation Update: A series that provides the latest updates in important ongoing cases from all levels of government

The Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speakers.Copyright The Federalist Society 政治・政府 政治学
エピソード
  • Proclaiming Liberty with Tim Sandefur

    Proclaiming Liberty with Tim Sandefur
    2026/07/01
    As America celebrates the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, Proclaiming Liberty by Timothy Sandefur revisits the revolutionary year of 1776 through the minds of John Adams and Thomas Jefferson, two men whose words and ideas gave birth to modern liberty. Sandefur’s engaging narrative brings to life the “American mind” as those extraordinary Founders sought to express it—their arguments, ideals, and enduring beliefs in natural rights and self-government.Sweeping from the English Civil War and the writings of Locke and Montesquieu to the colonial battles over the Stamp and Townshend Acts and the battlefields of Massachusetts and Virginia, Sandefur’s narrative shows how the Declaration distilled centuries of debate about freedom, law, and human nature into one of history’s most enduring statements on justice. Blending biography, political thought, and legal history—from Sir Edward Coke and Edmund Burke to Tacitus and Frederick Douglass—Proclaiming Liberty traces the Declaration’s legacy through the abolitionist movement, the Civil War, and the modern age, documenting how its principles have continued to challenge tyranny, refute relativism, and inspire movements for justice.Join us for this discussion between Prof. Lee Strang and Timothy Sandefur as they reflect on the Declaration's intellectual pedigree and enduring relevance for all who love freedom.
    Featuring:

    Timothy Sandefur, Vice President for Legal Affairs, Goldwater Institute
    Prof. Lee J. Strang, Executive Director, Salmon P. Chase Center for Civics, Culture, and Society, The Ohio State University
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間
  • From the Courthouse Steps: Pung v. Isabella County, Michigan

    From the Courthouse Steps: Pung v. Isabella County, Michigan
    2026/07/02
    In Pung v. Isabella County, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected claims under the Takings Clause and Excessive Fines Clause that the Constitution required compensation based on the property’s fair-market value, holding instead that surplus auction proceeds are the proper measure when the tax sale is fairly conducted. The decision preserves traditional tax-sale systems while leaving room for future challenges to unfair foreclosure procedures.Join us for a webinar breaking down the decision and its impact.
    Featuring:

    Prof. Ilya Somin, Professor of Law, Antonin Scalia Law School, George Mason University
    Deborah J. La Fetra, Senior Attorney, Pacific Legal Foundation
    続きを読む 一部表示
    31 分
  • From the Courthouse Steps: Mullin v. Doe

    From the Courthouse Steps: Mullin v. Doe
    2026/07/06
    In Mullin v. Doe, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in favor of the Trump administration, reversing lower-court orders that had halted the termination of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Syrian and Haitian nationals. The Court held that the TPS statute bars judicial review of non-constitutional challenges to DHS’s TPS termination decisions. It also concluded that the Haitian plaintiffs’ equal-protection claim was unlikely to succeed, reasoning that the administration’s across-the-board opposition to TPS as previously implemented supplied a strong race-neutral explanation for the termination.
    Join us for a webinar breaking down the decision, the separate opinions, and the case's potential impact.
    Featuring:

    Eric Wessan, Solicitor General, Iowa Office of the Attorney General
    James Rogers, Senior Counsel, America First Legal Foundation
    続きを読む 一部表示
    31 分
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません