Evaluating Psychiatric Symptoms in Complex Cases: Dr. Ashley VanDercar on Assessing for Malingering and Violence Risk
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
このコンテンツについて
In this episode of Emotional Damages, Dr. Ambarin Faizi sits down with Dr. Ashley VanDercar, fpamed forensic psychiatry associate, to explore how experts assess two of the most complex and high-stakes issues in forensic psychiatry: malingering and violence risk. Together, they explore the intricacies of malingering assessments and the importance of comprehensive record reviews. Dr. VanDercar then provides nuanced insights into violence risk factors, particularly in the context of severe mental illness. The episode concludes with practical advice for attorneys on effective collaboration with forensic psychiatric experts, emphasizing the synergy between legal context and psychiatric evaluation.
Key Topics Discussed:
- Potential presentations of malingering (pure, partial, or false imputation)
- How experts seek to differentiate genuine symptoms from feigned or exaggerated ones
- The notion of violence risk factors, and how experts assess violence risk
- Why attorney–expert collaboration strengthens the precision of forensic opinions
Have a topic you would like covered on the pod?
📧 Email us: podcast@fpamed.com
🔗 Connect with fpamed:
🌐 Visit our website.
👋 Follow us on LinkedIn.