『Ethical AI: When the Model Imposes Values Your Organisation Did Not Choose』のカバーアート

Ethical AI: When the Model Imposes Values Your Organisation Did Not Choose

Ethical AI: When the Model Imposes Values Your Organisation Did Not Choose

無料で聴く

ポッドキャストの詳細を見る
An AI model is in production somewhere in the organisation, handling a difficult decision: a customer complaint, a redundancy query, a medical underwriter reviewing a claim. The model settles what to refuse, how much candour the moment can bear, where the customer's interest gives way to the policy. It does this the same way each time, because the judgement was made long before the question arrived — not by the organisation running the model, but by the provider that built it, for a global product, before the organisation signed up to use it. In this episode of The Board in the Machine, Mario Thomas — Chartered Director and Fellow of the Institute of Directors — examines the value system every foundation model carries into deployment, why the familiar controls only partly contain it, and the strategic choice a Board is left holding once it sees the problem clearly. The argument draws on the 2026 arXiv paper "Alignment Drift in Multimodal LLMs", which found large and persistent differences in how model families handle ethically sensitive questions; the 2025 withdrawal of a major model update after it became excessively agreeable; Stanford's Foundation Model Transparency Index, which scored major providers at roughly 40 out of 100; and the disclosure obligations of the EU AI Act. Against that evidence the episode sets out the real decision — accept, reject, or build — and frames it through the Six Board Concerns, the AI Sovereignty Trilemma, and the discipline of Minimum Lovable Governance. This episode is for Boards and directors who want to govern the ethics their AI runs deliberately, deployment by deployment, rather than inherit it by default. Read the full article at mariothomas.com
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません