Episode 21 – The Disaster Recovery Test That Worked Only on Paper | CISA Domain 4: Business Continuity & DR Governance
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
このコンテンツについて
CISA Domain 4: Business Continuity & DR Governance
This episode is part of the CISA Audit Judgment Series — a structured learning path focused on Domains 4 and 5, the heaviest-weighted areas of the CISA exam.
In this episode, we analyze a Disaster Recovery test that was declared “successful” — even though no real failover occurred, no production data was restored, and no business validation took place. The test passed on paper, but not in reality. This scenario exposes a major gap in operational resilience maturity.
You’ll learn:
✔ Why CISA focuses on DR test evidence, not documentation
✔ Why DR tests fail despite official reports showing success
✔ How junior auditors interpret DR vs. how audit leaders evaluate capability
✔ What evidence auditors must review for DR governance
✔ How to assess RTO/RPO validation, test scope, and business involvement
✔ What CISA is actually testing in continuity and recovery questions
✔ The risks when DR tests pass on paper but fail in practice
This episode teaches CISA exam judgment and real audit leadership — the core of the CyberLex Audit Judgment Series.
If you’re preparing for CISA or sharpening your audit judgment,
explore the CISA Gold Standard Series by M.G. Vance on Amazon.
📘 Amazon link: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0FX526S3V
We don’t just help you pass.
We prepare you to become formidable in the field.