We push back on the idea that obstetrics “deserves” a malpractice crisis and explain how bad incentives and junk science can turn normal evidence-based care into courtroom blame. We also break down a few widely shared clinical myths and new research so we can practice with clearer eyes and less narrative noise.
• placental grading on ultrasound as low-value data with poor predictive power and high reader variability
• how malpractice commentary can seed plaintiff-friendly arguments against evidence-based off-label use
• why blaming misoprostol or “high-dose” oxytocin oversimplifies multifactorial outcomes
• quality improvement bundles as useful tools but weak proof without controls or causal clarity
• how massive verdicts and paid expert testimony can clash with modern science on cerebral palsy and HIE
• the FAA’s five hazardous attitudes and practical antidotes for high-stakes clinical work
• new data on LEEP versus cold knife cone for CIN, recurrence, HPV clearance, and access tradeoffs
• genetics and BMI as major drivers of gut microbiome patterns, not influencer narratives
• what a 1993 Doppler trial can and cannot prove, plus why replication changes conclusions

Be sure to check out thinkingaboutobgyn.com for more information and be sure to follow us on Instagram.

0:00 Welcome And Season Update

1:15 Placental Grading Myth On Ultrasound

6:44 Calling Out A Malpractice Influencer

14:06 The 2011 Policy Bundle Examined

23:20 What Drives The OB Malpractice Crisis

30:00 How Mega Verdicts Get Made

36:59 Five Hazardous Attitudes From Aviation

44:31 LEEP Versus Cone For CIN

48:04 Genetics And The Gut Microbiome

52:17 Does Doppler Ultrasound Harm Babies?

1:00:37 Recommendations And Closing

Follow us on Instagram @thinkingaboutobgyn.