Ep. 4 - The Stranger on the Porch
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
概要
We trace how Appalachian storytelling can carry a warning that science later proves, then follow the C8 contamination story as it moves across the Ohio River like a threat that never needed permission. We walk through how a rural water manager fought for a single number the system could not ignore, and why making results public changed what happened next.
• Appalachian communication as layered truth and shared burden
• The snake parable as a model for predictable harm and misplaced trust
• The Ohio River as boundary that never truly contains danger
• DuPont Washington Works and the Little Hocking wellfield separated by less than a mile
• Robert Griffin’s question “What about Ohio?” and why it upends the process
• Proprietary testing and the problem of proof being controlled
• C8 confirmed in 2002 and posted publicly without delay
• Why regulatory systems require a measurable number to act
• Using the Environmental Working Group tap water database to check contaminants by zip code
For Killer resources and more practical magic, visit our Ko Fi page at Ko-fi.com/killerchemistry
If this story makes you think differently about what’s in your tap, subscribe, share the episode with your friends - and leave a review so more people can find it.
Support the show