『Ep. 3 Who Decides What Care Is Worth』のカバーアート

Ep. 3 Who Decides What Care Is Worth

Ep. 3 Who Decides What Care Is Worth

無料で聴く

ポッドキャストの詳細を見る

概要

Send a text

Why does evidence not become accountability? This episode introduces hegemony and intersectionality to explain how exploitation becomes common sense — and why reform often stabilizes the very structure it claims to change. The workforce crisis is not a labor problem alone. It is a governance problem.


Works & Scholars Referenced

Toni Morrison — “A Humanist View” (1975); Playing in the Dark (1992)

Ruha Benjamin — Race After Technology (2019)

Kimberlé Crenshaw — “Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex” (1989)

Antonio Gramsci — Selections from the Prison Notebooks

Audre Lorde — “The Master’s Tools Will Never Dismantle the Master’s House” (1979)

Christine L. Williams — “The Glass Escalator” (1992)

Stuart Hall — “The Problem of Ideology” (1986)

Lea J.E. Austin — CSCCE racial wage gap and workforce research


Films & Documentaries

I Am Not Your Negro (2016)

Inequality for All (2013)

The Take (2004)

Make A Circle (2025) — Early childhood educators organizing for structural reform


You can find the full transcript, citations, and extended reading list at waginglove.org

If this work feels necessary to you, subscribe to the podcast so you don’t miss what comes next.

And if you believe care deserves structural accountability, consider sharing this episode with someone who shapes policy, works in early childhood, or depends on it.

Care has always been here.

The question is whether we will finally build a system that protects the people who provide it.

Support the show

まだレビューはありません