『Employment Law This Week Podcast』のカバーアート

Employment Law This Week Podcast

Employment Law This Week Podcast

著者: Epstein Becker & Green P.C.
無料で聴く

このコンテンツについて

Employment Law This Week® tracks the top developments in employment and labor law and workforce management in a matter of minutes every #WorkforceWednesday. This is the audio podcast version of the video series launched in October 2015 by law firm Epstein Becker Green.This EMPLOYMENT LAW THIS WEEK® podcast is copyrighted by Epstein Becker Green, P.C. All rights reserved. Provided for informational purposes only; not intended as legal advice. No attorney-client relationship. May be considered attorney advertising. マネジメント マネジメント・リーダーシップ 政治・政府 経済学
エピソード
  • #WorkforceWednesday: Social Media and Employee Firings: What Employers Need to Know
    2025/09/24

    This week, we examine how employers should address controversial employee social media activity, especially amid widespread social tension such as that seen after the murder of Charlie Kirk.

    Social Media and Employee Firings

    An employee’s off-duty conduct can be grounds for termination, but disciplining employees always carries some risk. Recent online discussions surrounding the public murder of Charlie Kirk have spurred firings across the nation, leaving employers exposed to backlash for their action or inaction.

    What Employers Need to Know:

    · “At-Will” Employment: While most employment is “at-will,” allowing termination for nearly any reason, collective bargaining agreements or individual employment contracts may limit an employer's ability to terminate based on off-duty conduct.

    · Employer Monitoring: Employers may monitor employee activity on company devices and networks and can act on publicly available social media posts.

    · Reputational Harm: Even where off-duty conduct is protected, actions that damage an employer's reputation can still be grounds for discipline.

    In this episode of Employment Law This Week®, Epstein Becker Green attorney Kimberly C. Carter offers guidance on addressing employee social media activity, emphasizing the importance of clear, proactive policies to set expectations and outline consequences.

    -

    Visit our site for this week’s Other Highlights and links: https://www.ebglaw.com/eltw405

    Download our Wage & Hour Guide for Employers app: https://www.ebglaw.com/wage-hour-guide-for-employers-app.

    Subscribe to #WorkforceWednesday: https://www.ebglaw.com/eltw-subscribe

    Visit http://www.EmploymentLawThisWeek.com

    This podcast is presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    4 分
  • #WorkforceWednesday: AI in the Workplace: California Sets a New Compliance Standard
    2025/09/17

    This week, we examine new artificial intelligence (AI) regulations in California impacting employers.

    AI in the Workplace: California Sets a New Compliance Standard

    Starting October 1, 2025, new AI rules in California will change how businesses in the state use automated tools in hiring, promotions, and other workplace decisions.

    Key Takeaways for Employers

    • Anti-Discrimination Measures: The new regulations specifically target discriminatory practices in employers’ use of automated decision systems (ADS).
    • Recordkeeping Requirements: Employers are now mandated to retain all ADS records and data for a minimum of four years.
    • Regulatory Precedent: California’s proactive stance on AI regulation is anticipated to influence similar regulatory frameworks nationwide, establishing a precedent for other states.

    In this episode of Employment Law This Week®, Epstein Becker Green attorney Frances M. Green provides an essential breakdown of the new California regulations, including actionable insights on conducting risk assessments and aligning them with existing cybersecurity and privacy audits to ensure compliance.

    Visit our site for this week’s Other Highlights and links: https://www.ebglaw.com/eltw404

    Download our Wage & Hour Guide for Employers app: https://www.ebglaw.com/wage-hour-guide-for-employers-app.

    Subscribe to #WorkforceWednesday: https://www.ebglaw.com/eltw-subscribe

    Visit http://www.EmploymentLawThisWeek.com

    This podcast is presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    4 分
  • #WorkforceWednesday: Remote Work and Religion: New Legal Risks for Employers in 2025
    2025/09/10

    As religious rights in the workplace gain new attention, a recent OPM memo broadening religious accommodations for federal employees could impact employers everywhere—at home and in the office.

    Essential Impacts for Employers:

    • The federal memo expands religious accommodations, including remote work.
    • The Supreme Court’s 2023 Groff v. DeJoy ruling raised the “undue hardship” standard, making it more difficult for employers to deny religious accommodation requests.
    • Accommodation requests are increasing, intersecting with remote work.

    These developments create new compliance challenges and potential legal risks for employers in the public and private sectors. Epstein Becker Green attorney Nancy Gunzenhauser Popper explains how to evaluate accommodation requests under the heightened standard and what the new federal memo could mean for your organization.

    Visit our site for this week’s Other Highlights and links: https://www.ebglaw.com/eltw403

    Download our Wage & Hour Guide for Employers app: https://www.ebglaw.com/wage-hour-guide-for-employers-app.

    Subscribe to #WorkforceWednesday: https://www.ebglaw.com/eltw-subscribe

    Visit http://www.EmploymentLawThisWeek.com

    This podcast is presented by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights are reserved. This audio recording includes information about legal issues and legal developments. Such materials are for informational purposes only and may not reflect the most current legal developments. These informational materials are not intended, and should not be taken, as legal advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances, and these materials are not a substitute for the advice of competent counsel. The content reflects the personal views and opinions of the participants. No attorney-client relationship has been created by this audio recording. This audio recording may be considered attorney advertising in some jurisdictions under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    4 分
まだレビューはありません