『E10: How JFK Leveraged Social Perception to stop the Cuban Missile Crisis』のカバーアート

E10: How JFK Leveraged Social Perception to stop the Cuban Missile Crisis

E10: How JFK Leveraged Social Perception to stop the Cuban Missile Crisis

無料で聴く

ポッドキャストの詳細を見る
October 1962. Nine men in a windowless room have mere days to stop a nuclear war neither side actually wants – but neither side can be seen to lose. Two Soviet letters arrive within a day of each other, one conciliatory, one a hardline ultimatum. And with a U.S. pilot being shot dead over Cuba, the clock is now measured in hours, not days. What President Kennedy and his advisors chose to do next reshaped how the U.S. and USSR would communicate for the rest of the Cold War – and almost nobody knew the real deal for decades.ExComm received two Soviet demands to end the standoff – a conciliatory private letter on Friday and a more a public, hardline demand was broadcasted from Radio Moscow on Black Saturday – coinciding with Major Rudolf Anderson's U-2 being shot down over Cuban airspace.Through a quantum cognition lens, four concepts explain how ExComm found a way out. Superposition reframed the decision from a binary blockade-or-invade choice into a richer set of hidden options for which Soviet letter to answer, and how. Interference came from the tension between projecting strength and avoiding cornering the soviets into a worse response – the same interference pattern shaping today's geopolitics. Contextuality mattered because the Bay of Pigs failure, looming midterm elections, and the broader Cold War all pulled the decision in different directions at once. And non-commutative effects – the order in which the two letters and the shootdown arrived – changed how ExComm interpreted Soviet intent. Rather than picking one path, Kennedy combined them: publicly honoring the conciliatory letter, privately trading Turkey-based missiles for Cuba's, giving both superpowers a win at home.=================================What you'll take away:Why treating a negotiation as more than two options can reveal a de-escalating third path neither side saw at firstHow the order in which information arrives can change what a decision seems to demand, even when the facts themselves don't changeWhy visible confidence in a decision shapes whether others resist it or fall in line behind it=================================Primary Sources:Mojzisch, A., & Krug, K. (2008). Cells, circuits, and choices: social influences on perceptual decision making. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 8(4), 498–508. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.8.4.498Saha Roy, T., Giri, B., Saha Chowdhury, A., Mazumder, S., & Das, K. (2020). How our perception and confidence are altered using decision cues. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 13, 1371. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.01371Thompson, L., & Hastie, R. (1990). Social perception in negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47(1), 98–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(90)90048-ESecondary Sources:Cuban missile crisis decision-making lessonsCuban missile crisis irrational factors historiographyKhrushchev emotional decision-making OxfordEssence of Decision, Graham AllisonNuclear deterrence anomaly scholars lessonsMirroring Risk, Renshon missile estimationWise leadership Cuban missile crisis case studyJFK groupthink origin, Bay of PigsJFK White House tape recordingsRobert Kennedy Cuban missile crisis reinterpretationJFK Library Cuban missile crisis chronologyJFK Library October 27 day-by-dayState Department Cuban missile crisis milestonesJupiter missiles sealing the deal, Wilson CenterHow Anderson's death may have prevented nuclear warThirteen Days on quarantine decision, On The IssuesBlockade decision as consequence analysisKennedy's September 1962 political warning, NSA1962 October surprise midterm electionEpisode Tags / Keywords Cuban Missile Crisis, JFK, ExComm, Black Saturday, quantum cognition, decision science, Cold War, Nikita Khrushchev, nuclear deterrence, groupthink, negotiation theory, behavioral psychology, cognitive bias, foreign policy decision-making, Bay of Pigs, social perception
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません