This episode discusses how state run media is widely considered unpopular in American culture due to the idea of the government controlling biases in the media. Yet despite being in a more popular dimocracy fromat, people often choose biased politically infleunced media anyways. The diologue then talks aboit how we can break out of biased media cycle that people dont like in America.

In this episode, John Hallack and Sam Hernandez explore the unique impact tournaments bring to sports. They highlight how nearly every major sport thrives on tournament formats, creating fair, exciting, and competitive outcomes. The conversation contrasts this with politics, where media bias, ratings, and party machinery often shape results before real competition begins. John and Sam argue that sports remain more enjoyable than politics precisely because of their authentic, head-to-head matchups. They close by considering how tournament-style systems could level the playing field for political candidates, just as they do in athletics.

This episode explores the parallels between sports and politics—focusing on how fans and voters alike tend to pick sides and develop tribal loyalties. It delves into the way our instinctive tribalism drives us to view opposing supporters with suspicion or disdain. Unlike sports, where clear wins and losses define outcomes, politics lacks such definitive scorekeeping, making the idea of "winning" far more subjective and complex.