Disagreement is an Educational Tool: A Case for Viewpoint Diversity in Higher Education
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
概要
After challenging a dominant academic framework about privilege, a graduate student received the worst grade of his life. Curious, he reran the experiment — submitting basically the same paper with the opposite conclusion — and saw it praised. That moment set Nafees Alam on a mission to champion viewpoint diversity, constructive disagreement, and open inquiry in higher education. In this episode, he explains why classrooms should be places of point-counterpoint education, not indoctrination, why real intellectual strength means being able to argue the other side without losing yourself. From culture wars to tenure reform, it’s a conversation about playing the academic game and changing it.
Episode originally aired 1/8/25. When We Disagree will return from spring break soon!
Tell us your argument stories!
- Email guest and topic suggestions to us at whenwedisagree@gmail.com
- Follow us on Instagram