Did John Boyd Leave Game Theory Out of the OODA Loop
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
Send us Fan Mail
Game theory tries to solve the game. The OODA loop reshapes the conditions under which any game gets played. Brian "Ponch" Rivera and Mark "Moose" McGrath open the archives and ask a sharp question: John Boyd clearly understood game theory, so why is it nearly absent from A Discourse on Winning and Losing?
The answer is Orientation. Game theory assumes a fixed board with stable payoffs. Boyd assumes every representation is incomplete and open to manipulation, and that the act of observing changes the game itself. You cannot optimize a matrix while your opponent is dissolving it. Sparked by Donald D. Hoffman and Andrew Gallimore's new "Traces of Others" paper, this is a fast, host-only reorientation on why the real OODA loop is not a menu of options and never was.
OODA loop, John Boyd, orientation, non-linear OODA, decision making under uncertainty, game theory, destruction and creation, implicit guidance and control, maneuver warfare.
John R. Boyd's Conceptual Spiral was originally titled No Way Out. In his own words:
“There is no way out unless we can eliminate the features just cited. Since we don’t know how to do this, we must continue the whirl of reorientation…”
Stay connected with No Way Out and The Whirl Of ReOrientation
X: @NoWayOutcast · @PonchAGLX · @NoWayOutMoose
Substack: The Whirl Of ReOrientation - www.thewhirl.substack.com