You can feel it happening: the internet is getting louder, flatter, and more crowded with machine-written words. So where does that leave writers who actually care about voice, craft, and meaning? Etty, Heidi, and Jane talk through the real, messy middle of generative AI and writing, from the stats behind AI content growth to the gut-level question writers keep asking privately: can I use ChatGPT without giving away my work or my integrity?

We dig into the trust problem first. AI tools can “hallucinate” with total confidence, spitting out fake citations, dummy links, and quotes that never existed. Jane shares how this shows up in content marketing and research workflows and why fact-checking is NOT optional. Then we pivot into creativity and the New York Times experiment “Can You Tell Which Short Story ChatGPT Wrote?” and why one oddly human detail can make a story feel alive while the AI version reads like competent drivel.

From there, we get practical. We talk about reasonable use cases for authors: bios, query-letter help, marketing copy, social posts, and rewriting a paragraph when you’re stuck, while keeping the manuscript itself human. We also get honest about data privacy, enterprise “sandbox” setups, and why many writers should refuse to upload full drafts. Finally, we look at how publishing is responding, including agents asking writers to attest they did not use AI, and what a future full of AI slop could mean for readers and for the value of human-made art.

Subscribe for more conversations like this, share the episode with a writer friend, and leave us a review so more listeners can find the show. Where do you personally draw the line with AI and writing?

Send us Fan Mail

Email us at info@thewomenareplotting.com, and find us on all the socials. Be safe and be excellent to each other.