エピソード

  • Survivorship bias: classifications that mislead you when copying

    Survivorship bias: classifications that mislead you when copying
    2025/12/15
    Summary: The text explains survivor bias in copy trading: rankings highlight only those who are still around, not those who failed, making apparent profits look better than they are. Relying on short-term results or “golden” performers can mask risk and lead to copy decisions based on luck rather than skill. To avoid this bias, the speaker offers a practical framework for evaluating operators and building a durable copy portfolio, including longer histories, risk visibility, consistency, stable position sizes, transparency, understanding the edge, and meaningful metrics. The message emphasizes backtesting across market cycles and smart diversification, with concrete rules and exercises to test profiles before copying. The goal is to move from chasing appearances to adopting a methodical, risk-aware investment process. Key points and steps: - Survivor bias definition: rankings show only survivors, skewing perceived skill and profitability. - Problems with common rankings: short evaluation windows, emphasis on gross returns while hiding drawdowns, and profiles that reset or rely on hot streaks. - Episode objective: learn to filter, measure risk, and build a copy portfolio that lasts. - Step-by-step filters: 1) History: at least 12 months and ~20 trades; avoid relying on a few wins. 2) Visible risk: assess the equity curve; require a cumulative-return-to-maximum-drawdown ratio of at least 2. 3) Consistency: more than half of months positive; drawdowns recover within months. 4) Trade size/leverage: prefer stable sizing; avoid chasing losses. 5) Transparency: beware of erased history or frequent strategy changes. 6) Edge quality: understand the edge in two sentences; if not, be wary. 7) Metrics: use risk-adjusted metrics (e.g., Sharpe) and watch the length of negative streaks. - Practical guidance: apply filters on the platform, anticipate that few profiles passing the sieve is a good sign. - Diversification: copy multiple operators with different styles; limit exposure per operator (e.g., max 10%); use a loss exit if an operator exceeds their historical max drawdown. - Backtesting and realism: test strategies across up, down, and sideways markets; prefer median results over means. - Quick exercise: seven days, review one operator per day with the checklist, decide whom to copy and why. - Reflection questions: how many operators disappeared from rankings; what loss threshold triggers an exit; what you learn from setbacks. - Takeaway: survivor bias can turn copy trading into a lottery; the aim is a disciplined, survivable investment approach. End note (contact): Remeber you can contact me at andresdiaz@bestmanagement.org
    続きを読む 一部表示
    8 分
  • Hidden correlation: does copying traders double your risk?

    Hidden correlation: does copying traders double your risk?
    2025/12/15
    Summary: - The episode explains Hidden Correlation in copy trading: duplicating several traders can unintentionally duplicate the same risk, making a diversified portfolio behave like a single bet, especially during market stress. - Hidden correlation types: - Asset correlation: traders end up trading the same instruments. - Factor correlation: different assets depend on the same macro drivers (e.g., dollar strength, interest rates). - Time correlation: similar trading schedules react to news together. - Style correlation: similar trading styles (trend-following or mean reversion) amplify shared signals. - Core idea: true diversification means mixing different sources of risk, not just more traders. - Five-step method to detect/reduce hidden correlation: 1) Exposure snapshot: map traders’ main markets, directions, horizons, leverage, and base currency. 2) Instrument overlap: check overlap in assets; if half or more overlap, reduce either or both positions. 3) Return correlation: compute correlations of traders’ returns; >0.7 suggests duplicated exposure; consider rank correlation for robustness. 4) Risk-based weights: allocate by risk contribution rather than equal capital; dampen weights for highly correlated traders to push average correlation toward 0.5 or less. 5) DIY stress tests: simulate plausible moves (oil, rates, dollar moves) to assess total portfolio impact; similar outcomes across scenarios indicate monoculture. - Important considerations: - Base currency can inflate correlations; include traders with different currency logic or hedging. - Common mistakes: chasing top performers by rank, mixing only one style, equal-weighting, ignoring the economic calendar. - 15-minute mini-plan to improve today: - 5 minutes: list traders and color-code main assets/factors. - 5 minutes: download recent returns and compute correlations; keep pairs below 0.5; review above 0.7. - 5 minutes: rebalance to risk parity; add loss limits per trader and overall portfolio loss limit. - Key question: will a central bank surprise affect all parts of the portfolio similarly, or will different components react differently? - Practical tips for better diversification: - Time diversification: mix very short-term with longer horizons. - Asset/factor diversification: combine currencies, indices, commodities, crypto with different engines (growth, value, rate sensitivity). - Geographic/time-zone diversification: include traders from Asian/European sessions if US-dominated. - Light humor and closing takeaway: - Diversification without checking correlation is like carrying two identical umbrellas in a storm. - Three actionable takeaways: measure correlation, weight by risk, and test across scenarios. - Call to action: subscribe, share feedback, and contact the author for strategies (links referenced in the episode). Remeber you can contact me at andresdiaz@bestmanagement.org
    続きを読む 一部表示
    7 分
  • Free margin when copying traders: avoid forced liquidations

    Free margin when copying traders: avoid forced liquidations
    2025/12/15
    Summary: - Topic and core idea: The episode explains free margin in copy trading and why avoiding forced closures hinges on keeping free margin sufficient (free margin = equity minus used margin). - Key definitions: balance, equity (balance plus floating P/L), used margin (broker’s hold to keep positions open), free margin, and margin level (equity divided by used margin × 100). If free margin falls low, a margin call or forced close can occur. - Practical question: Know your minimum margin level before liquidations with your broker; some platforms trigger alerts below certain levels and may begin staged liquidation. - Five actionable rules to avoid forced closures when copying with leverage: 1) Define a cushion: keep a margin level above a personal minimum (the author suggests >200% as a safe baseline; keep extra reserves for volatile assets like crypto). 2) Size by maximum drawdown: allocate capital so worst-case drawdown keeps you above your floor (e.g., use 1.5x safety factor, and avoid putting all capital into a strategy with high drawdown). 3) Diversify by non-correlation, not by quantity: mix across different assets and strategies so bad moves aren’t synchronized. 4) Set platform limits: impose rules like avoiding new trades when heavily loaded, daily/monthly loss limits, max size per instrument, and max open positions per trader. 5) Reserve for events: reduce risk before major news/events; consider pausing copying if your strategies aren’t built for high volatility. - Mini-tutorial (practical steps to act today): 1) Note current margin level and liquidation threshold. 2) Review each trader’s history (max drawdown, average simultaneous positions). 3) Estimate potential used margin from typical position sizes, number of positions, and instrument leverage. 4) Allocate capital so even in the worst recent scenario, margin stays above your floor. 5) Add a cushion for martingale/averaging-down strategies. 6) Set alerts for equity and margin; reduce exposure if triggered. - Additional notes: - In some platforms, copying is proportional to equity rather than free margin, which can risk too-small or late openings if you’re already committed elsewhere. - Investor psychology: when markets rise, don’t overextend; take profits or move risk to sub-accounts; in tricky markets, reduce risk early. - Overall takeaway: Align risk management concepts (risk, free margin, diversification, disciplined limits) to make copy trading robust and less prone to liquidations. - Final prompt: Consider what you will change today in your copy limits to raise your margin above your floor; implement and review weekly. Remeber you can contact me at andresdiaz@bestmanagement.org
    続きを読む 一部表示
    7 分
  • Copy open positions or only new ones in Copy Trading?

    Copy open positions or only new ones in Copy Trading?
    2025/12/08
    Summary: - Topic: Copy trading decisions between copying open trades vs. copying only new trades, and how this choice affects risk, synchronization, and peace of mind. - Core idea: The best outcome is not the fastest trade, but the best synchronized trade with the operator. - Key definitions: - Copy opens: enter the operator’s existing positions at the current price. - Copy only new: wait for new signals and don’t inherit existing moves. - Main question: Which approach is better depends on your objective, the operator’s style, and current market conditions. - Practical method: A five-step rule to decide case by case. 1) Define your objective (learn with low risk vs. grow with controlled risk). 2) Assess the operator’s profile (number of opens, exposure, leverage, drawdown). 3) Analyze entry gap (difference between operator’s average entry price and current price). 4) Consider market context (volatility and macro events vs. calm trends). 5) Establish control mechanics (copy size, stop loss, exposure per operator). - Quick color-code guidance: - Green: copying opens when position count is few, trends are long-term, leverage is low, price gap is reasonable. - Yellow: mixed positions and mild turbulence; reduce size. - Red: many advanced trades, price extended, unclear loss limit; prefer only new. - Analogies: Copying opens is like arriving late to a party; copying only new is like arriving just in time for appetizers—both have trade-offs. - Biases: Fear of missing the rally can push to copy opens at the worst moment; synchronization with the operator is the goal, not beating them. - Actionable checklist: - Define your objective in one sentence. - Review operator’s history and drawdown. - Count opens and evaluate price-distance. - Determine initial copy size (smaller for opens, medium for only new). - Use price alerts and implement stepwise copying. - Advanced tip: If copying opens, enter in two or three tranches to reduce slippage; if copying only new, pre-define entry rules and exit conditions. - Matching horizon: A day trader may suit only-new copying; a medium-term operator may suit copying opens if entry price can align over time. - Hidden value: Measure before you copy; avoid haste and use a disciplined criterion for synchronization. - Episode goal (in one line): Calmly decide when to copy opens vs. copy only new to improve risk-adjusted return and peace of mind, gaining clarity. - Closing prompts: Reflect on your real objective, fear of entering late vs. losing capital, and what evidence you need to trust an operator’s opens. - Additional notes: If you want to copy his strategies, there are links in the podcast description; a Telegram group shares favorite strategies. Remeber you can contact me at andresdiaz@bestmanagement.org
    続きを読む 一部表示
    8 分
  • Latency and Slippage: Why Your Copies Don't Enter at the Same Price.

    Latency and Slippage: Why Your Copies Don't Enter at the Same Price.
    2025/12/01
    This episode explains how latency (delay from signal to execution) and slippage (the difference between the expected and filled price) affect copy trading. It outlines why these frictions occur along the order path, especially during fast-moving moments or high-volatility news, and provides practical steps to minimize their impact. The guidance covers technical setups, platform configurations, timing and asset considerations, how to measure actual results, how to evaluate signal providers, and risk management. The core message is to treat copy trading as an engineering problem with concrete actions you can implement today to protect and improve your entries. Key takeaways: - Use the same broker or a fast-execution setup, ideally with no dealing desk and good liquidity in your copied instruments. - Consider a private VPS near your broker’s server to reduce latency; keep your computer light and stable. - Tune platform settings: set a slippage tolerance, choose between market vs limit orders, set per-instrument caps, and decide whether to copy opens or closes based on the strategy’s tempo. - Be mindful of timing: major liquidity pairs and inactivity around news generally have lower slippage; avoid copying around volatile moments unless you’re prepared for larger moves. - Measure reality: export copied trades, compute mean/median slippage, log time/instrument/news to identify patterns. - Evaluate signal providers for execution quality, not just profitability: look at average trade time, hours, instruments, risk coherence, and how they react to news. - Some brokers cap positive slippage or ban it; read contract terms to know how favorable moves are treated. - Practical actions: test latency, try small price tolerances, split copies between market and limit orders, adjust tolerances during high-volatility periods, and pause copying during unclear events. - Useful tricks: apply tight limits for broad strategies, use market orders for continuation trades with high probability, and consider copying the close price in trend-following strategies. - Risk management: set maximum daily losses per day, per provider, and per instrument. Remeber you can contact me at andresdiaz@bestmanagement.org
    続きを読む 一部表示
    8 分
  • Martingale alert: how to detect it before copying

    Martingale alert: how to detect it before copying
    2025/10/13
    Summary: - Episode goal: teach you how to detect a martingale before copying trades on a copy-trading platform to protect capital and improve risk-adjusted returns. - What a martingale is: a money-management approach that increases trade size after losses to recover and win; theoretically tempting but can exhaust finite capital; in markets it leads to large drawdowns. - How to detect it before copying: - Equity curve: beware slow gains followed by a sudden cliff; a perfectly steady uptrend is suspicious. - Win rate vs. average loss: very high win rates (e.g., >90%) with losses much larger than gains are red flags. - Trade duration: winners closed quickly, losses allowed to run; long losing periods vs. short winning periods indicate trouble. - Grid of orders: many open trades in the same direction or averaging down with increasing size signals a martingale. - Leverage and margin: increasing exposure after losses, negative floating, shrinking usable margin suggest reliance on a market move to recover. - Provider descriptions: promises of no losses, guaranteed daily profit, or no drawdowns are common red flags. - Practical audit steps: - Step 1 (public metrics): max drawdown, win rate, average win vs. loss, time in trade, number of simultaneous trades, exposure per asset. - Step 2 (trade-by-trade): look for loss caps, whether losses are cut or allowed to breathe. - Step 3 (concentration): avoid strategies relying on a single asset with overall losses. - Step 4 (backtest/practice): backtest when possible or test in a practice/demo account before real copy trading. - Counterintuitive guidance: prefer a history of small, frequent losses and modest gains over many tiny gains with one catastrophic loss; focus on risk-adjusted returns, not just monthly gains. - Actionable filtering rules (defensive framework): - Do not copy strategies without a stop loss. - Avoid providers with win rate above 85% and with average loss greater than average gain. - Do not copy grids that increase position size. - Demand controlled maximum drawdown and an equity curve with natural pauses. - Set a total loss limit per provider on the platform. - Educational note: this is not personalized advice; emphasize risk control, diversification, and monitoring to make copy trading safer. - Closing question: choose a solid process with controlled losses over a hollow promise of perfection, which helps you sleep better and avoid disproportionate losses. - Call to action: options to follow the creator’s personal strategies (links in description) and join a Telegram group for suggested strategies. - Final reminder: long streaks exist in probability; risk management is essential to avoid hidden risks revealed by extreme events. Remeber you can contact me at andresdiaz@bestmanagement.org
    続きを読む 一部表示
    7 分
  • Evaluate the long-term consistency of a copied trader.

    Evaluate the long-term consistency of a copied trader.
    2025/10/06
    - The episode discusses how to evaluate the long-term consistency of copied traders, focusing on sustainable growth and risk control rather than short-term gains. - True consistency means capital grows over time with manageable losses, visible across different market conditions; avoid traders with large drawdowns or profits tied to a single signal. - Practical evaluation steps: - Review history over 18–24 months, noting number of positive months, drawdown depth, and length of losing streaks. - Analyze risk management: position sizing, stops, and loss limits. - Assess performance in various market environments to gauge adaptability. - Consider win rate alongside risk-adjusted returns (average return per trade and gain-to-loss ratio). - Check liquidity and execution quality (slippage and trading costs). - Important caveat: consistency often means a stable long-term trajectory rather than every month being positive. - Action plan for you: - Define return targets and your risk threshold. - Use a minimum evaluation period (e.g., 18 months) and track results monthly. - Compute indicators: average monthly return, % positive months, maximum drawdown and duration, risk/benefit ratio. - Compare with your risk tolerance; adjust diversification or capital allocation as needed. - Start with a demo or small allocation before scaling. - Practical starter: maintain a spreadsheet with month, monthly return, max drawdown, number of trades, win rate, and return per trade; monitor sustainability, loss control, and risk exposure stability; note changes in risk management or strategy if losses occur mid-period. - The podcast also mentions links in the description to copy the host’s strategies and a Telegram group for sharing strategies, with emphasis on transparency and risk monitoring to build trust. - Key takeaway: long-term consistency is driven by disciplined rules, periodic review, and data-driven adjustments, not luck or constant optimization. - If you want deeper help, the host offers guidance to build your own evaluation system for more predictable results. Remeber you can contact me at andresdiaz@bestmanagement.org
    続きを読む 一部表示
    6 分
  • Consistency signals for copy traders

    Consistency signals for copy traders
    2025/10/06
    - The episode, hosted by Andrés Díaz, explains what consistency means for copied traders and how to spot someone with a steady, risk-managed track record rather than just occasional spikes in performance. - Core idea: consistency = a balance of solid performance, disciplined risk management, patience, and discipline. Look for repeatable patterns like moderate, sustained returns, fewer losses in downturns, and disciplined capital management. - Seven-step framework to assess and maintain consistency: 1) Define clear criteria before copying (e.g., annual target, monthly drawdown cap, win/loss ratio) and write down 2–3 indicators to track for at least six months. 2) Review history under different market conditions; consider 3, 6, and 12-month performance, not just the best month. 3) Diversify across multiple well-chosen strategies to reduce idiosyncratic risk; allocate capital with predefined limits and review weekly. 4) Test in a controlled environment (demo or small amount) and document lessons to adjust criteria. 5) Set alerts and schedule regular reviews (daily/weekly alerts, biweekly reviews) and decide what signal would trigger stopping. 6) Manage risk with discipline (capital allocation per trader, per-trade and per-period loss limits, stop losses, sensible take-profits; have an exit plan if performance worsens). 7) Validate consistency with real data using risk-adjusted metrics (e.g., Sharpe, Sortino, or net profit-to-drawdown) to ensure gains aren’t offset by large losses. - Mid-episode note: the creator promotes copying his personal strategies via links in the podcast description and his Telegram group. - Catchphrases and ideas emphasize that consistent performance includes controlled losses, daily discipline, and patient, steady work over chasing shortcuts. - Practical takeaway: create a mini consistency plan outlining which trader to copy, capital share, acceptable risk, and review cadence; start conservatively and scale only if criteria remain met. - Fun fact: successful copy platform users tend to diversify and stay vigilant without obsessing over every tick; consistency comes from simple, repeated, prudent decisions. - Final thought: automation and a trained eye can work together; use tracking tools, log decisions, and review periodically to stay focused on sustained profitability. The speaker invites a weekly habit to move toward greater consistency. - Closing: thanks for listening; encouragement to subscribe, comment, or share; contact information provided. Remeber you can contact me at andresdiaz@bestmanagement.org
    続きを読む 一部表示
    5 分