エピソード

  • Copy open positions or only new ones in Copy Trading?

    Copy open positions or only new ones in Copy Trading?
    2025/12/08
    Summary: - Topic: Copy trading decisions between copying open trades vs. copying only new trades, and how this choice affects risk, synchronization, and peace of mind. - Core idea: The best outcome is not the fastest trade, but the best synchronized trade with the operator. - Key definitions: - Copy opens: enter the operator’s existing positions at the current price. - Copy only new: wait for new signals and don’t inherit existing moves. - Main question: Which approach is better depends on your objective, the operator’s style, and current market conditions. - Practical method: A five-step rule to decide case by case. 1) Define your objective (learn with low risk vs. grow with controlled risk). 2) Assess the operator’s profile (number of opens, exposure, leverage, drawdown). 3) Analyze entry gap (difference between operator’s average entry price and current price). 4) Consider market context (volatility and macro events vs. calm trends). 5) Establish control mechanics (copy size, stop loss, exposure per operator). - Quick color-code guidance: - Green: copying opens when position count is few, trends are long-term, leverage is low, price gap is reasonable. - Yellow: mixed positions and mild turbulence; reduce size. - Red: many advanced trades, price extended, unclear loss limit; prefer only new. - Analogies: Copying opens is like arriving late to a party; copying only new is like arriving just in time for appetizers—both have trade-offs. - Biases: Fear of missing the rally can push to copy opens at the worst moment; synchronization with the operator is the goal, not beating them. - Actionable checklist: - Define your objective in one sentence. - Review operator’s history and drawdown. - Count opens and evaluate price-distance. - Determine initial copy size (smaller for opens, medium for only new). - Use price alerts and implement stepwise copying. - Advanced tip: If copying opens, enter in two or three tranches to reduce slippage; if copying only new, pre-define entry rules and exit conditions. - Matching horizon: A day trader may suit only-new copying; a medium-term operator may suit copying opens if entry price can align over time. - Hidden value: Measure before you copy; avoid haste and use a disciplined criterion for synchronization. - Episode goal (in one line): Calmly decide when to copy opens vs. copy only new to improve risk-adjusted return and peace of mind, gaining clarity. - Closing prompts: Reflect on your real objective, fear of entering late vs. losing capital, and what evidence you need to trust an operator’s opens. - Additional notes: If you want to copy his strategies, there are links in the podcast description; a Telegram group shares favorite strategies. Remeber you can contact me at andresdiaz@bestmanagement.org
    続きを読む 一部表示
    8 分
  • Latency and Slippage: Why Your Copies Don't Enter at the Same Price.

    Latency and Slippage: Why Your Copies Don't Enter at the Same Price.
    2025/12/01
    This episode explains how latency (delay from signal to execution) and slippage (the difference between the expected and filled price) affect copy trading. It outlines why these frictions occur along the order path, especially during fast-moving moments or high-volatility news, and provides practical steps to minimize their impact. The guidance covers technical setups, platform configurations, timing and asset considerations, how to measure actual results, how to evaluate signal providers, and risk management. The core message is to treat copy trading as an engineering problem with concrete actions you can implement today to protect and improve your entries. Key takeaways: - Use the same broker or a fast-execution setup, ideally with no dealing desk and good liquidity in your copied instruments. - Consider a private VPS near your broker’s server to reduce latency; keep your computer light and stable. - Tune platform settings: set a slippage tolerance, choose between market vs limit orders, set per-instrument caps, and decide whether to copy opens or closes based on the strategy’s tempo. - Be mindful of timing: major liquidity pairs and inactivity around news generally have lower slippage; avoid copying around volatile moments unless you’re prepared for larger moves. - Measure reality: export copied trades, compute mean/median slippage, log time/instrument/news to identify patterns. - Evaluate signal providers for execution quality, not just profitability: look at average trade time, hours, instruments, risk coherence, and how they react to news. - Some brokers cap positive slippage or ban it; read contract terms to know how favorable moves are treated. - Practical actions: test latency, try small price tolerances, split copies between market and limit orders, adjust tolerances during high-volatility periods, and pause copying during unclear events. - Useful tricks: apply tight limits for broad strategies, use market orders for continuation trades with high probability, and consider copying the close price in trend-following strategies. - Risk management: set maximum daily losses per day, per provider, and per instrument. Remeber you can contact me at andresdiaz@bestmanagement.org
    続きを読む 一部表示
    8 分
  • Martingale alert: how to detect it before copying

    Martingale alert: how to detect it before copying
    2025/10/13
    Summary: - Episode goal: teach you how to detect a martingale before copying trades on a copy-trading platform to protect capital and improve risk-adjusted returns. - What a martingale is: a money-management approach that increases trade size after losses to recover and win; theoretically tempting but can exhaust finite capital; in markets it leads to large drawdowns. - How to detect it before copying: - Equity curve: beware slow gains followed by a sudden cliff; a perfectly steady uptrend is suspicious. - Win rate vs. average loss: very high win rates (e.g., >90%) with losses much larger than gains are red flags. - Trade duration: winners closed quickly, losses allowed to run; long losing periods vs. short winning periods indicate trouble. - Grid of orders: many open trades in the same direction or averaging down with increasing size signals a martingale. - Leverage and margin: increasing exposure after losses, negative floating, shrinking usable margin suggest reliance on a market move to recover. - Provider descriptions: promises of no losses, guaranteed daily profit, or no drawdowns are common red flags. - Practical audit steps: - Step 1 (public metrics): max drawdown, win rate, average win vs. loss, time in trade, number of simultaneous trades, exposure per asset. - Step 2 (trade-by-trade): look for loss caps, whether losses are cut or allowed to breathe. - Step 3 (concentration): avoid strategies relying on a single asset with overall losses. - Step 4 (backtest/practice): backtest when possible or test in a practice/demo account before real copy trading. - Counterintuitive guidance: prefer a history of small, frequent losses and modest gains over many tiny gains with one catastrophic loss; focus on risk-adjusted returns, not just monthly gains. - Actionable filtering rules (defensive framework): - Do not copy strategies without a stop loss. - Avoid providers with win rate above 85% and with average loss greater than average gain. - Do not copy grids that increase position size. - Demand controlled maximum drawdown and an equity curve with natural pauses. - Set a total loss limit per provider on the platform. - Educational note: this is not personalized advice; emphasize risk control, diversification, and monitoring to make copy trading safer. - Closing question: choose a solid process with controlled losses over a hollow promise of perfection, which helps you sleep better and avoid disproportionate losses. - Call to action: options to follow the creator’s personal strategies (links in description) and join a Telegram group for suggested strategies. - Final reminder: long streaks exist in probability; risk management is essential to avoid hidden risks revealed by extreme events. Remeber you can contact me at andresdiaz@bestmanagement.org
    続きを読む 一部表示
    7 分
  • Evaluate the long-term consistency of a copied trader.

    Evaluate the long-term consistency of a copied trader.
    2025/10/06
    - The episode discusses how to evaluate the long-term consistency of copied traders, focusing on sustainable growth and risk control rather than short-term gains. - True consistency means capital grows over time with manageable losses, visible across different market conditions; avoid traders with large drawdowns or profits tied to a single signal. - Practical evaluation steps: - Review history over 18–24 months, noting number of positive months, drawdown depth, and length of losing streaks. - Analyze risk management: position sizing, stops, and loss limits. - Assess performance in various market environments to gauge adaptability. - Consider win rate alongside risk-adjusted returns (average return per trade and gain-to-loss ratio). - Check liquidity and execution quality (slippage and trading costs). - Important caveat: consistency often means a stable long-term trajectory rather than every month being positive. - Action plan for you: - Define return targets and your risk threshold. - Use a minimum evaluation period (e.g., 18 months) and track results monthly. - Compute indicators: average monthly return, % positive months, maximum drawdown and duration, risk/benefit ratio. - Compare with your risk tolerance; adjust diversification or capital allocation as needed. - Start with a demo or small allocation before scaling. - Practical starter: maintain a spreadsheet with month, monthly return, max drawdown, number of trades, win rate, and return per trade; monitor sustainability, loss control, and risk exposure stability; note changes in risk management or strategy if losses occur mid-period. - The podcast also mentions links in the description to copy the host’s strategies and a Telegram group for sharing strategies, with emphasis on transparency and risk monitoring to build trust. - Key takeaway: long-term consistency is driven by disciplined rules, periodic review, and data-driven adjustments, not luck or constant optimization. - If you want deeper help, the host offers guidance to build your own evaluation system for more predictable results. Remeber you can contact me at andresdiaz@bestmanagement.org
    続きを読む 一部表示
    6 分
  • Consistency signals for copy traders

    Consistency signals for copy traders
    2025/10/06
    - The episode, hosted by Andrés Díaz, explains what consistency means for copied traders and how to spot someone with a steady, risk-managed track record rather than just occasional spikes in performance. - Core idea: consistency = a balance of solid performance, disciplined risk management, patience, and discipline. Look for repeatable patterns like moderate, sustained returns, fewer losses in downturns, and disciplined capital management. - Seven-step framework to assess and maintain consistency: 1) Define clear criteria before copying (e.g., annual target, monthly drawdown cap, win/loss ratio) and write down 2–3 indicators to track for at least six months. 2) Review history under different market conditions; consider 3, 6, and 12-month performance, not just the best month. 3) Diversify across multiple well-chosen strategies to reduce idiosyncratic risk; allocate capital with predefined limits and review weekly. 4) Test in a controlled environment (demo or small amount) and document lessons to adjust criteria. 5) Set alerts and schedule regular reviews (daily/weekly alerts, biweekly reviews) and decide what signal would trigger stopping. 6) Manage risk with discipline (capital allocation per trader, per-trade and per-period loss limits, stop losses, sensible take-profits; have an exit plan if performance worsens). 7) Validate consistency with real data using risk-adjusted metrics (e.g., Sharpe, Sortino, or net profit-to-drawdown) to ensure gains aren’t offset by large losses. - Mid-episode note: the creator promotes copying his personal strategies via links in the podcast description and his Telegram group. - Catchphrases and ideas emphasize that consistent performance includes controlled losses, daily discipline, and patient, steady work over chasing shortcuts. - Practical takeaway: create a mini consistency plan outlining which trader to copy, capital share, acceptable risk, and review cadence; start conservatively and scale only if criteria remain met. - Fun fact: successful copy platform users tend to diversify and stay vigilant without obsessing over every tick; consistency comes from simple, repeated, prudent decisions. - Final thought: automation and a trained eye can work together; use tracking tools, log decisions, and review periodically to stay focused on sustained profitability. The speaker invites a weekly habit to move toward greater consistency. - Closing: thanks for listening; encouragement to subscribe, comment, or share; contact information provided. Remeber you can contact me at andresdiaz@bestmanagement.org
    続きを読む 一部表示
    5 分
  • Volatility-based allocation: avoid overexposure when copying traders.

    Volatility-based allocation: avoid overexposure when copying traders.
    2025/09/29
    Summary: - The episode discusses volatility-based allocation for copy trading as a way to avoid overexposure and painful drawdowns when volatility spikes. - Core idea: allocate capital based on each trader’s historical volatility, using inverse-volatility weights so steadier traders get more exposure. - Practical steps include: gather a universe of traders, obtain volatility data, and implement a risk-management framework with minimum/maximum exposure per trader and an overall portfolio risk target. - How weights are calculated: compute each trader’s historical volatility, set weights as w_i = (1/σ_i) / sum(1/σ_j), and apply exposure caps (e.g., 5%–35% per trader). Rebalance regularly (e.g., monthly) to reflect changing volatility and correlations. - Example given: three traders with volatilities 0.20, 0.35, 0.15 yield inverse-vol weights that allocate roughly 34%, 20%, and 46% respectively, illustrating that steadier traders receive more exposure without domination. - Discussion prompts: assess whether your portfolio already uses diversification or relies on a single star trader; consider risks of concentrating on one operator, especially during volatile streaks. - Additional insights: high macro volatility can raise asset correlations, reducing diversification; volatility filters and exposure limits tend to smooth maximum drawdowns. - Practical considerations: decide between monthly or more frequent rebalances, set exposure stops (e.g., if a trader loses 8–10% of their allocated share), and automate rebalances if possible. - Philosophical takeaway: volatility is a compass that helps navigate markets; the goal is to balance potential gains with stability, not copy the biggest winner. - Practical enhancements: track each trader’s maximum drawdown and correlations; adjust weights if Drawdown spikes or correlations change; maintain discipline to avoid overconfidence during favorable periods. - Closing: invites listeners to follow the speaker’s strategies via links in the podcast description and emphasizes disciplined risk management for sustainable growth. Remeber you can contact me at andresdiaz@bestmanagement.org
    続きを読む 一部表示
    6 分
  • Capital allocation by trading style

    Capital allocation by trading style
    2025/09/22
    - The episode explains capital allocation by trader style: building a diversified portfolio that yields steady results and withstands drawdowns, rather than chasing a single winning trade. - Four trader styles with typical allocations: - Conservative: 40–60% in low-risk strategies (stable currencies, synthetic bonds, liquid low-vol ETFs); risk per trade < 2%. - Balanced: 25–40% in moderately volatile positions; diversification across quality stocks, bonds, and structured products. - Moderately Dynamic: 15–30% in higher-volatility trades with strict exits and weekly reviews. - Dynamic/Aggressive: 10–25% in fast-changing trades (scalping, breakouts) with daily limits and correlation monitoring. - Core idea: mix styles to balance return and risk, reducing dependence on any one profit stream and providing protection during drawdowns. - Step-by-step method: 1) Define your risk profile and annual return target, plus acceptable maximum drawdown. 2) Identify your dominant style and one or two secondary styles, and decide allocations. 3) Set entry and exit rules for each style (e.g., conservative 1–2% stops; aggressive 3–5% stops with 2:1 or 3:1 targets). 4) Allocate capital across styles (example base: Conservative 50%, Balanced 30%, Moderately Dynamic 15%, Aggressive 5%). 5) Monitor weekly and adjust if trades drift from the plan or drawdowns exceed expectations. - Practical tips: use copy-trading tools with risk limits and alerts; diversify across markets (currencies, stocks, commodities, crypto); maintain discipline with clear rules and regular result reviews. - Key insights: risk per trade can be tied to historical volatility, not just position size; the goal is a fixed, manageable exposure per trade. - Quick start: define your dominant style and return goal, set simple capital allocations with risk rules, and share your 12-week targets and results. - Bottom line: capital allocation by trader style is a practical map for navigating volatility with discipline and clear review processes, helping you build confidence and consistency. Remeber you can contact me at andresdiaz@bestmanagement.org
    続きを読む 一部表示
    7 分
  • Performance audit: identifying consistent traders.

    Performance audit: identifying consistent traders.
    2025/09/15
    Summary: - The episode by Andrés Díaz explains how to identify consistently profitable traders for copy trading by focusing on long-term consistency rather than a single strong month. - Key idea: true profitability comes from steady, repeatable performance across months, even during volatility and news events. - Seven-step framework: 1) Define consistency criteria (time horizon of 6–12 months, acceptable risk limits). 2) Collect performance data for each trader (monthly returns, drawdowns, trades). 3) Analyze curve stability using a consistency index (mean return divided by volatility). 4) Evaluate relative risk (max drawdown, gain-to-loss ratio, Sharpe) and avoid relying on gross profit alone. 5) Assess diversity and dependence among traders; diversify across different styles (intraday, swing, fundamental). 6) Conduct backtesting/offline testing to simulate performance under stress. 7) Implement gradually with ongoing monitoring and transparency (start small, set alerts, require publishable history). - Practical application steps: use tracking templates, set a minimum consistency threshold (e.g., 6 consecutive positive months with drawdown under 10%), run a 3–6 month backtest, then a small live trial, and perform quarterly reviews with a lessons-learned log. - Extra tips: keep a trade diary to spot patterns, ensure transparency, and consider combining continuous education with performance auditing to improve success rates. - Closing notes: invites listeners to subscribe, engage, and contact through provided channels; emphasizes that performance auditing is an investment in informed decision-making and risk management. Remeber you can contact me at andresdiaz@bestmanagement.org
    続きを読む 一部表示
    6 分