Conversational Apologetics | Avoiding Conversational Pitfalls
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
Conversational Apologetics | Avoiding Conversational Pitfalls
-
ナレーター：
-
著者：
Season 2, Episode 135
In this episode, Michael and Zach continue their series on conversational apologetics by examining several common ways good arguments can be undermined by poor communication. Drawing from Gregory Koukl’s Tactics, they discuss the “Steamroller,” the “Rhodes Scholar,” and the importance of getting the facts right. The conversation explores why overwhelming someone with information is rarely persuasive, why credentials do not automatically settle an argument, and why Christians should be prepared to challenge unsupported factual claims without becoming combative. Along the way, Michael and Zach return to Koukl’s ambassador model, emphasizing that wise apologetics is relational: listen carefully, make one point at a time, ask good questions, and keep the focus on helping people think rather than trying to impress or overpower them.
Find our videocast here: https://youtu.be/MZ68u0-Nt9I
Merch here: https://take-2-podcast.printify.me/
Music from #Uppbeat (free for Creators!):
https://uppbeat.io/t/reakt-music/deep-stone
License code: 2QZOZ2YHZ5UTE7C8
Find more Take 2 Theology content at http://www.take2theology.com