Adrienne is joined by co-host and team member Emily Doyle for the first time, and they're diving into a topic that's deeply personal and deeply backed by research: why women leaders get labeled as cold, bossy, aggressive, or intimidating. and what's really going on underneath those labels.

Adrienne shares the story of the first time she was called cold at age 21 or 22, in a group staff meeting, and how she unknowingly carried that label for years.
Emily shares her own experience being called "the bitch down in pastries" at 19 during a dinner service. Sound familiar? It probably does.

This isn't just lived experience. The data backs it up.

The research they cover:

• The Double Bind Study: women were seen as either competent or likable, but rarely both. Men? Both simultaneously.
• The Abrasive Label Study: out of 248 performance reviews, the words "abrasive," "bossy," or "aggressive" appeared 71 times in women's reviews and zero times in men's.
• Research showing men's critical feedback focused on skill development, while women's focused on personality criticism ("watch your tone").
• When men express anger at work, they're seen as high status and competent. When women express the exact same emotion, they're seen as out of control
• The Heidi/Howard Study: identical case studies, only the name changed.
• Women score higher than men in 11 of 12 emotional intelligence competencies and score 3–5 points higher on EQ overall.
• Teams led by high-EQ leaders show better performance, higher engagement, and lower turnover.
  

What "cold" usually really means: She had boundaries. She didn't manage my emotions for me. She didn't perform femininity the way I expected.

What to do instead of shrinking: Adrienne and Emily talk through the "high care, high standards" model, how to deliver direct, clear feedback in a way that communicates warmth without softening your standards or apologizing for your competence.

They also cover:

• Why women internalize these labels and sometimes start performing them
• AI and ChatGPT as an echo chamber of society's gender bias (Adrienne's story about being recommended second to a list of men)
• The "ask questions" strategy for responding to inappropriate or passive-aggressive comments in the workplace
• Why the data shows women are actually more wired for modern leadership.
  

00:00 Welcome & introducing co-host Emily Doyle

05:31 Today's topic: Why women leaders get called cold

06:57 Adrienne's first "cold" label at 21 — and how it stuck

11:16 Emily's story: "The bitch down in pastries"

13:05 What "cold" usually actually means

16:06 The research: The Double Bind Study

17:23 The Abrasive Label Study — 71 vs. zero

18:34 Personality criticism vs. skill feedback in reviews

19:22 The Heidi/Howard Study

24:50 High care, high standards — how to add warmth without shrinking

25:09 What cold feedback vs. warm-direct feedback sounds like in practice

31:34 Why women may be more wired for modern leadership

33:33 The 69% stat and why high EQ is a competitive advantage

35:00 The "ask questions" strategy for handling inappropriate comments

Follow Adrienne on Instagram!
Transcript