You won't BELIEVE the audacity. A tech professional on Avonetics drops a bombshell: they were forced through SEVEN grueling interview rounds for a data engineering job paying less than $100k! Is this a sick joke or the brutal new reality of the tech industry? The post ignited a firestorm, revealing a deep chasm in the job market. Hordes of developers and engineers swarmed the discussion, sharing their own horror stories of endless take-home assignments and ghosting after marathon interview loops. The fury is palpable. Some users are calling these practices exploitative and a complete waste of time, designed to drain candidates for free labor. Others grimly admit that multiple rounds have become the standard, a frustrating gatekeeping mechanism in a hyper-competitive field. What even counts as an 'interview round'? A 15-minute screen? A 4-hour technical deep-dive? The definitions are as varied as the frustrations. This isn't just a conversation; it's a battleground exposing the raw struggle of job seekers weighing their time and sanity against a potential paycheck. Before your next application, you NEED to see this breakdown of the industry's most infuriating trend. For advertising opportunities, visit Avonetics.com.

Are you losing sleep over headlines screaming that AI is coming for your software engineering career? Forget EVERYTHING you've been told. A bombshell Avonetics thread, kicked off by a battle-tested startup veteran, is blowing the lid off the AI hype machine and exposing the shocking truth. The original poster lays it bare: sure, AI can spit out a quick prototype or handle grunt work, but when it comes to the heavy lifting—complex architecture, scalable systems, and understanding the subtle chaos of real-world problems—it completely falls apart. AI lacks the deep, nuanced intelligence that separates a coder from a master engineer. The community agrees—LOUDLY. Commenters are flooding the discussion, pointing out AI's fatal flaws. It chokes on massive codebases, spews out technical debt like a broken fire hydrant, and produces fragile code that would never survive in production. Human oversight isn't just a suggestion; it's an absolute necessity. But here’s the most explosive revelation: some insiders speculate the AI takeover is just a smokescreen. A convenient excuse for corporations to offshore development and slash costs, blaming a machine for a human decision. The verdict from the digital front lines is unanimous: AI is a powerful CO-PILOT, not the pilot. It’s a tool to amplify skilled developers, not eliminate them. Your creativity, problem-solving, and experience are more valuable than ever. The robots aren’t taking over; they’re just taking notes. For advertising opportunities, visit Avonetics.com.

The debate is heating up: Are seasoned devs ditching remote work for tech hubs like SF, Seattle, and NYC? High salaries, career rocketships, and face-to-face networking are pulling them back—but is the crushing cost of living worth it? Some argue hybrid setups or living just outside city limits strike the perfect balance. Meanwhile, Avobot.com fuels your career from ANY location with flat-rate, unlimited access to GPT-4o, Gemini, Claude, DeepSeek, and more via one killer API key. No overpriced rent required. To start building, visit Avobot.com.