Benjamin Alarie joins hosts Nathan Kiker and George Bogdan to examine how rapidly improving AI systems can strengthen the administration of law—starting with tax, where complexity, volume, and inconsistency have long constrained access to justice. Alarie argues that legal AI is transitioning from promise to performance, producing measurably more accurate and comprehensive research while enabling the kind of population-level analysis that policymakers and practitioners have struggled to execute at scale.

The conversation moves beyond abstract fairness debates to operational impact. Drawing on a decade of building tools at BlueJ Legal, Alarie underscores a sharp decline in user disagreement with AI-generated answers as models and workflows have matured. He details how adversarial research techniques—prompting strongest counterarguments and “braiding” outputs from multiple frontier models—paired with strict verification against primary sources, drive better outcomes. The result is faster, deeper, and more consistent analysis across statutes, cases, and administrative guidance.

A core strategic theme is harmonization. Legal AI can help reconcile fragmented regimes—tax versus employment standards, antitrust versus trade policy, or Quebec’s civil law alongside common-law provinces—by mapping doctrine to practical outcomes and integrating empirical evidence. That capability enables more consistent enforcement, clearer incentives for firms, and a stronger foundation for preventative governance rather than purely reactive adjudication.

Alarie is clear on limits: AI augments, not replaces, professional judgment. Accountability remains with human experts, and progress in tools must be matched by attention to the digital divide—where paper filings, limited connectivity, and uneven digital literacy still impede equitable access. For policymakers and leaders, the stakes are systemic: modernization of legal research and administration can reduce friction in markets, enhance compliance, and promote rule-of-law consistency across jurisdictions. Allery’s new book, Superjustice: The Future of Law, outlines these pathways in depth.

Key Topics Discussed

- Performance over theory: why disagreement with AI-generated legal answers is falling and what that signals about maturity in real-world research workflows.
- Harmonizing fragmented regimes: using AI to surface cross-jurisdictional patterns, reconcile conflicting doctrines, and align legal incentives with policy goals.
- Adversarial AI research: stress-testing conclusions by eliciting strongest counterarguments, braiding multiple model outputs, and verifying against primary sources.
- From cases to populations: enabling empirical, population-level analyses of legal outcomes that inform better policy design and preventative governance.
- Access and equity: the digital divide, persistent reliance on paper processes, and why infrastructure and adoption dynamics will shape AI’s impact on justice.

About the Guest

Benjamin Alarie is the CEO of BlueJ Legal and co-author of Superjustice: The Future of Law. He has spent the past decade building AI tools for tax and related legal research, bringing a practitioner’s mindset to model design, verification, and workflow integration. His experience positions him to assess where legal AI delivers real value, how to measure it, and what it will take to translate technical progress into fairer, more consistent legal outcomes.

Timestamps

- 00:00 — Framing the opportunity: why tax is a proving ground for legal AI
- 06:20 — Measuring performance: accuracy, coverage, and declining user disagreement
- 14:05 — Harmonization use cases across jurisdictions and practice areas
- 22:30 — Adversarial techniques and multi-model “braiding” for resilient answers
- 30:15 — Empirical synthesis: population-level insights for policy and compliance
- 38:10 — Professional accountability and verification against primary sources
- 44:55 — Adoption dynamics: legislative, judicial, and organizational factors
- 51:40 — Digital divide, paper processes, and access-to-justice implications
- 57:10 — Closing reflections and resources (Superjustice at superjustice.com)

Support the show

David Ignatius assesses how a fragmenting international order is reshaping U.S. strategy, allied cohesion, and day‑to‑day security. He argues the Middle East is settling into a harder-edged equilibrium: Iran’s hardliners have gained leverage despite battlefield setbacks to Tehran’s proxies; the Strait of Hormuz will likely reopen on Iran’s terms; and Turkey’s assertiveness is now a central strategic variable for Israel. These dynamics matter because they redefine risk at an energy chokepoint and test Washington’s ability to manage allies with diverging interests.

Joining hosts Nathan Kiker and George Bogdan, Ignatius is struck by China’s passivity during the Hormuz crisis—even as Beijing’s technological and manufacturing advantages deepen. That paradox, he warns, could reshape American life unless the U.S. rebalances supply chains and rebuilds industrial capacity. In a world where economic power is concentrating while geopolitical discipline is eroding, technological dependence becomes a strategic liability.

Beyond the region, Ignatius contends the U.S.-led postwar order is decaying without a clear successor. Asian allies read mixed U.S. signals on trade and security, even as Japan emerges as Washington’s most trusted partner and Vietnam’s importance grows. The result is a wary Indo-Pacific looking for consistency and credible capacity rather than speeches and episodic deals.

On Ukraine, Ignatius sees a brutal but durable stalemate that is strategically costly for Russia, with domestic support eroding under the strain. Ukraine’s rapid drone innovation is setting a new standard for modern conflict, altering cost curves and operational tempo. Yet the greater risk, he cautions, may be a destabilized, post‑Putin Russia—an outcome that could be more dangerous than a negotiated pause if not carefully managed.

Ignatius closes with a broader worry: a two‑speed world where technology races ahead while geopolitics fragments is unsustainable. Smarter policy, tighter allied coordination, and potentially AI‑enabled systems for crisis management may be necessary to restore a measure of stability so people can live “normal” lives.

• Why Iran’s hardliners—and the IRGC (Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps)—hold more leverage despite proxy setbacks, and how a reopened Strait of Hormuz on Tehran’s terms would reset regional risk.
• Turkey’s growing assertiveness and what it means for Israel’s strategy, Gulf cohesion, and the balance among non‑Arab power centers.
• China’s conspicuous silence during the Hormuz crisis contrasted with its accelerating edge in technology and manufacturing—and why U.S. supply chain resilience is now a strategic imperative.
• The fading U.S.-led order in Asia: allies unsettled by inconsistent trade and security signals, Japan’s rise as the most trusted partner, and Vietnam’s expanding role in regional balancing.
• Ukraine’s grinding stalemate, the strategic erosion of Russian support for the war, the battlefield impact of rapid drone innovation, and the risks posed by a chaotic post‑Putin Russia.

David Ignatius is a columnist and associate editor at the Washington Post, widely recognized for reporting and analysis on foreign affairs, intelligence, and national security. He has covered the Middle East, U.S. strategy, and great‑power competition for decades and is the author of several acclaimed novels rooted in geopolitical and intelligence themes.

Support the show

Brad Thor returns to the show to discuss his latest thriller, Choke Point, a geopolitical suspense novel that explores one of the most consequential strategic questions of the 21st century: what happens if China gains control over the world's most critical maritime chokepoints.

A #1 New York Times bestselling author and creator of the Scott Harvath series, Thor explains how real-world concerns about China's Belt and Road Initiative, the Strait of Malacca, and gray-zone warfare inspired the novel's plot. He discusses the growing importance of shipping lanes, soft power, and strategic infrastructure in global competition, as well as why he believes the next major geopolitical challenge for the United States will center on China.

The conversation also explores covert conflict, military deception, the lessons of history, and how fiction can help readers better understand emerging threats before they become tomorrow's headlines. Thor reflects on the evolution of Scott Harvath after 25 years, the changing reading habits of modern audiences, and why geopolitical thrillers remain a powerful way to engage with the world around us.

00:00 Introduction to Brad Thor and Choke Point
01:17 China's Belt and Road Strategy Explained
05:25 The Plot Behind Choke Point
07:08 Historical Lessons: D-Day, Deception, and Taiwan
09:02 Why Shipping Lanes Matter More Than Ever
12:29 China, Gray Zone Warfare, and Global Competition
18:08 Why Readers Are Increasingly Focused on China
22:38 Scott Harvath's Evolution After 25 Years
25:50 Wealth, Influence, and Foreign Policy
29:03 Writing with Ward Larsen and Crafting Thrillers
32:17 Social Media, Attention Spans, and the Future of Reading
36:10 Will Scott Harvath Ever Retire?
38:07 Final Thoughts on Choke Point

Support the show