Boots on the Ground Would Doom Republicans in the Midterms
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
ご購入は五十タイトルがカートに入っている場合のみです。
カートに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
Boots on the Ground Would Doom Republicans in the Midterms
-
ナレーター：
-
著者：
概要
The concern is not fringe: MAGA-aligned veterans like Rep. Eli Crane (AZ), Rep. Derrick Van Orden (WI), and Rep. Ryan Mackenzie (PA) have all publicly opposed boots on the ground, with even Speaker Mike Johnson calling a ground invasion unnecessary.
Despite the White House claiming 9,000+ Iranian targets destroyed, 90% reduction in missile launches, and 140+ naval vessels eliminated, the Strait of Hormuz remains effectively closed and oil has surged from ~$70 to over $100 a barrel.
Congressional Republicans are growing frustrated with the administration's lack of strategic transparency — House Armed Services Chairman Mike Rogers and Rep. Nancy Mace both emerged from classified briefings feeling misled and uninformed about the endgame.
A new AP-NORC poll shows only about 2 in 10 Republicans support deploying ground troops to Iran, with half opposed — a direct rebuke of escalation from within the president's own base.
Republican voters aren't abandoning Trump, but they are pattern-matching to Iraq and Afghanistan: they voted for a president who promised to end wars, not start new ones, and their enthusiasm is being tested heading into a midterm year.
Senate Democrats, led by Tim Kaine, have forced three consecutive war powers votes — not to win them, but to build a campaign record that turns every Republican "yes" vote into a 2026 liability if the war drags on.
The Democrats' political trap is airtight: Republicans who vote to constrain the war look chaotic; those who vote to continue it own all subsequent consequences, including potential American casualties on Iranian soil.
The Pentagon is simultaneously pursuing a 15-point peace plan through Pakistan while deploying additional Marines and airborne units — a contradictory posture that signals the administration itself is uncertain whether diplomacy will hold.
The article's core argument: the conservative tradition distinguishes between calibrated force tied to achievable ends (Reaganite realism) and momentum-driven escalation — Republicans who supported a defined operation did not sign up for a land war in Persia, and should say so publicly rather than anonymously.
Read More: https://patriot.tv/boots-on-the-ground-would-doom-republicans-in-the-midterms/
まだレビューはありません