『Bible and Theology Matters: Insightful Conversations with Bible Scholars』のカバーアート

Bible and Theology Matters: Insightful Conversations with Bible Scholars

Bible and Theology Matters: Insightful Conversations with Bible Scholars

著者: Dr. Paul D. Weaver - DTS Professor and Biblical Scholar
無料で聴く

このコンテンツについて

The Bible and Theology Matters Podcast is a conversation with Biblical Scholars about all things Bible and Theology, including: challenging issues of Bible interpretation, important theological topics, essential Hermeneutical principles, Bible backgrounds and customs, Biblical ethics and worldview, apologetics, biblical archaeology, and much more. Dr. Paul D. Weaver, Professor and Biblical Scholar at Dallas Theological Seminary is the host.Copyright Paul D Weaver キリスト教 スピリチュアリティ 教育 聖職・福音主義
エピソード
  • The Synoptic Problem - What is It? Why is It Important?
    2025/07/03
    In this episode of the Bible and Theology Matters podcast, Dr. Paul Weaver engages with Dr. David Allen Black to discuss the synoptic gospels, the synoptic problem, and the historical origins of the gospels. They explore the significance of external evidence, the role of the Church Fathers, and the implications of Markan priority. Dr. Black presents his fourfold gospel hypothesis, emphasizing the need for historical context in understanding the development of the gospels. The conversation also addresses common concerns regarding the reliability of the gospels and the importance of examining evidence critically.

    This video explores the **two source hypothesis** related to the origins of the Gospels in the Bible. The speaker explains how understanding this theory can impact the way people interpret biblical texts, and how it is related to the **synoptic problem**.

    -The term 'synoptic' means to view the gospels together.
    -The synoptic problem may not be a problem at all.
    -External evidence is often overlooked in gospel studies.
    -Markan priority is a dominant theory, but has its challenges.
    -The early church unanimously believed Matthew was the first gospel.
    -Historical context is crucial for understanding the gospels.
    -The Church Fathers provide valuable insights into gospel authorship.
    -The Q hypothesis is speculative and lacks concrete evidence.
    -The Christian faith is rooted in historical evidence.
    -Scholars should be approached with caution; personal investigation is essential.

    00:00 Introduction to the Podcast and Guest
    01:31 Understanding the Synoptic Gospels
    04:59 Exploring the Synoptic Problem
    05:19 Three Lines of Evidence for Gospel Order
    08:32 Questioning Markan Priority
    10:39 Historical Context of Gospel Development
    17:50 The Role of Early Church Fathers
    24:11 The Fourfold Gospel Hypothesis
    28:08 Unity in the Early Church
    29:09 Historical Context of the Gospels
    30:32 Occasional Nature of New Testament Letters
    31:58 The Role of the Gospels in Addressing Needs
    33:13 Critique of Markan Priority
    35:30 Historical Perspectives on Gospel Origins
    36:57 The Importance of Church History
    39:24 The Enlightenment's Impact on Gospel Scholarship
    41:09 The Interconnectedness of Biblical Studies
    43:26 The Role of Language in Understanding the Gospels
    45:56 Different Styles and Purposes of Gospel Writers
    52:13 Addressing Lay Concerns about Gospel Reliability
    続きを読む 一部表示
    54 分
  • BTM - 160 - Matthew or Mark? - Which Gospel Came First
    2025/06/19
    In this conversation, Dr. Will Varner discusses his extensive research on the Gospels, particularly focusing on the authorship of the Gospels and the his belief that Matthew was written first (Matthew Priority rather than Markan Priority) and then Luke, and finally Mark. He explores the historical context of Gospel writing, the influence of higher criticism on the New Testament, and the significance of early church fathers like Papias and Irenaeus. Varner argues for a reevaluation of the traditional views on Gospel authorship, emphasizing the Jewish context of Matthew and the implications of these findings for contemporary biblical scholarship and bible study as well as exegesis and hermeneutics. In this conversation, Dr. William Varner and Dr. Paul Weaver delve into the complexities of the Gospels, particularly focusing on the relationship between Matthew and Mark. They discuss the implications of the unique details found in Mark's Gospel. The conversation also touches on the role of the Holy Spirit in guiding the authors, the debate between Matthew Priority and Mark Priority, and the influence of modern scholarship on these views. Varner recommends several resources for those interested in exploring Matthew Priority further, emphasizing the importance of understanding the Gospels in their historical and theological context.

    0:00 Introduction
    02:21 - Dr. Varner's Journey and Insights on the Gospels
    07:15 - Debating Markan vs. Matthean Priority
    12:31 - The Role of Early Church Fathers in Establishing Priority
    19:00 - Understanding Papias and the "Hebrew Dialect"
    24:52 - The Synoptic Problem and Mutual Dependence
    31:03 - Exploring the Influence of Academia on Gospel Studies
    38:07 - Recommended Resources for Further Study
    続きを読む 一部表示
    42 分
  • BTM 159 - Why Michael Licona is Wrong about "Flexible Inerrancy"
    2025/06/15
    In this conversation, Dr. West and Dr. Weaver critically examine Michael Licona's views on biblical inerrancy, particularly his concept of 'flexible inerrancy.' They express concern over the implications of Licona's arguments for the integrity of scripture and the lack of pushback from the evangelical community. The discussion highlights the need for a robust dialogue on these theological issues and the role of evangelical institutions in addressing them.

    - Michael Licona's book raises significant concerns about biblical inerrancy.
    - Licona's concept of 'flexible inerrancy' is extremely problematic.
    -There is a lack of pushback from evangelical scholars against Licona's views.
    - Licona's arguments are viewed as a form of theological liberalism.
    - The speakers express sadness over Licona's departure from traditional beliefs.
    - There is a call for more engagement and critique of Licona's work.
    - The role of evangelical institutions in addressing these issues is discussed.
    - The conversation highlights the need for a robust response to Licona's views at ETS.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    12 分

Bible and Theology Matters: Insightful Conversations with Bible Scholarsに寄せられたリスナーの声

カスタマーレビュー:以下のタブを選択することで、他のサイトのレビューをご覧になれます。