Alan Jackson joins Billy Bush as the Lindsay Clancy case goes to the jury.

Moments after closing arguments concluded, the famed Karen Read defense attorney breaks down the prosecution and defense cases — and explains why he believes the Commonwealth has not met its burden of proof.

Jackson analyzes Kevin Reddington’s emotional closing argument, Jennifer Sprague’s case for premeditation, the battle between the psychiatric experts, and the central issue the jury must now decide: whether Lindsay Clancy was legally responsible for killing her three children or was in the grip of a psychotic break.

Jackson also explains how experienced trial lawyers speak directly to individual jurors during closing arguments, why Reddington’s courtroom style may have connected so effectively, and why the failures of the mental-health system became part of the case whether prosecutors wanted them to or not.

Billy and Alan also discuss Reddington’s connection to the Karen Read case, problems Jackson sees with Massachusetts investigations, Karen Read’s continuing legal battles, and Jackson’s upcoming defense of Fraser Bohm.

Now the arguments are over.

The jury is deliberating — and Alan Jackson makes his call.

#LindsayClancy #AlanJackson #KevinReddington #LindsayClancyTrial #KarenRead #BillyBush #HotMics #TrueCrime #CourtTV #Trial #BreakingNews

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.