Acupuncture Isn't the Whole of TCM: Why Titles and Training Matter
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
Acupuncture Isn't the Whole of TCM: Why Titles and Training Matter
-
ナレーター：
-
著者：
概要
Modernizing the acupuncture profession involves adopting a shared language of titles and training standards to ensure integration with global health systems. While the public often meets various providers using needles, clear titles (like Licensed Acupuncturist or TCM Practitioner) are essential for safety and quality transparency. The article highlights two pivotal developments: ICD-11 dual-coding, which allows TCM patterns (e.g., "Qi stagnation") to be recorded alongside conventional diagnoses, and updated WHO benchmarks that define minimum expectations for training and practice.
This "digital infrastructure" makes clinical reasoning machine-readable, allowing TCM logic to interoperate with EHRs and research tools. Practitioners are encouraged to use light-lift outcome measures—such as pain scales and functional markers—to document value without overclaiming. By aligning clinic procedures with WHO practice benchmarks regarding needle safety and sterilization, practitioners strengthen public trust. Ultimately, these measures are not bureaucratic chores; they are acts of professionalism that secure a place for TCM within the evolving landscape of modern, evidence-based healthcare.