#61 David Enoch | Why This Oxford Professor Thinks Morality is Objective
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
#61 David Enoch | Why This Oxford Professor Thinks Morality is Objective
-
ナレーター：
-
著者：
このコンテンツについて
Dr. David Enoch, author of "Taking Morality Seriously: A Defense of Robust Realism," joins me to discuss moral realism versus anti-realism, objections from the moral error theorist, and my personal sticking points in affirming the existence of irreducible moral facts: moral disagreement across cultures and evolutionary explanations for our moral beliefs.
Buy David's book defending robust moral realism.
To support the channel, do please oh please consider donating via PayPal or Buy Me a Coffee.
Feel free to follow me Twitter.
EPISODE CHAPTERS
00:00:00 Introduction
00:07:23 Naturalism vs. non-naturalism
00:19:23 Why should we reject moral error theory?
00:32:32 The revisionary costs of error theory
00:43:34 Intuition as our only ground for moral realism?
00:47:45 The connection to ethical intuitionism
00:51:19 Objection #1 - Moral disagreement
01:03:18 Moral skepticism
01:06:20 Objection #2 - Evolutionary debunking arguments
01:16:16 Is God required to explain objective morality?
01:20:45 Are most philosophers moral realists?