#496 The Scorecard: Golf’s Ultimate Test of Integrity
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
概要
In professional golf, the scorecard is far more than an administrative document. It is a binding declaration of personal responsibility, reflecting the sport’s unique reliance on honesty and self-governance. While tournament committees calculate totals, the player alone is responsible for the accuracy of each hole score once the card is signed. Under long-standing principles of the Rules of Golf, this responsibility carries strict liability, meaning intent is irrelevant when an error occurs.
History is filled with examples showing how unforgiving this system can be. Submitting a score lower than actually taken has traditionally resulted in automatic disqualification, regardless of circumstances. Legends such as Mark Roe and Jesper Parnevik experienced this in painful fashion at the 2003 Open Championship. A simple failure to exchange scorecards led both players to sign for scores recorded on the wrong cards. Despite correct hole-by-hole numbers and no competitive advantage gained, Roe was disqualified after a brilliant 67 that left him in contention for the Claret Jug. The controversy ultimately forced the R&A and USGA to amend Rule 6-6d, allowing committees to waive disqualification for this specific clerical error.
By contrast, signing for a higher score than actually made is permitted, but the higher total must stand. The most famous example is Roberto De Vicenzo at the 1968 Masters. After his marker mistakenly recorded a par instead of a birdie, De Vicenzo signed without noticing. He was not disqualified, but the higher score cost him a playoff and a chance at the Green Jacket—an outcome that became a defining lesson in vigilance.
Where golf draws an absolute line is deliberate manipulation. The 1992 case of Johan Tumba remains the clearest example. During European Tour Qualifying School, Tumba altered his scorecard after it had been signed. The Tour treated the matter as fraud, employing forensic techniques such as ESDA paper analysis and ink chromatography, reportedly with assistance from Scotland Yard. The evidence proved intentional alteration, resulting in a ten-year ban (later reduced), and a permanent stain on his reputation.
Severe sanctions for cheating are rare but decisive. David Robertson received a 20-year ban in 1985 for repeatedly moving his ball marker to gain advantage, the harshest punishment in European Tour history. Later cases, such as Elliot Saltman, resulted in shorter suspensions, reflecting modern legal constraints but the same moral standard.
Together, these cases explain why the scorecard remains golf’s most powerful symbol. It can define championships, end careers, and confer either lasting respect or enduring stigma—because in golf, integrity is not assumed, it is signed.
- 📺 The Explainer
- www.Golf247.eu