In this episode, we break down why Bitcoin feels range-bound despite massive macro shifts happening in the background. We explore whether the traditional 4-year cycle is breaking, how Fed policy and liquidity signals are changing the game, and what a potential U.S. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve could mean if the government begins accumulating BTC at scale.

The conversation then expands into tariffs, UBI experiments, and how society might transition into an AI-driven future without destabilizing everything in the process. From there, we connect the dots between emerging military AR systems, space-based compute, and why energy, security, and infrastructure are becoming the defining narratives of the next decade.

In the final stretch, we go deep on Bitcoin’s long-term security budget problem, why fees alone may not be enough, and how NAT introduces a sustainable second subsidy for miners without changing Bitcoin’s consensus rules. We also cover miner adoption, hash-power tipping points, and why this could be one of the most important developments in Bitcoin’s history.

Topics:

1. First up, breaking down why Bitcoin feels range-bound despite massive macro shifts happening in the background.
2. Next, tariffs, UBI experiments, and how society might transition into an AI-driven future without destabilizing everything in the process.
3. and Finally, deep dive into Bitcoin’s long-term security budget problem, why fees alone may not be enough, and how NAT introduces a sustainable second subsidy for miners

Please like and subscribe on your favorite podcasting app!

Sign up for a free newsletter: www.theblockrunner.com

Follow us on: Youtube: https://bit.ly/TBlkRnnrYouTube

Twitter: bit.ly/TBR-Twitter

Telegram: bit.ly/TBR-Telegram

Discord: bit.ly/TBR-Discord

$NAT Telegram: https://t.me/dmt_nat