21 Days vs 365: How a Stalking Victim Was Failed by California Courts
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
21 Days vs 365: How a Stalking Victim Was Failed by California Courts
-
ナレーター：
-
著者：
In March 2025, Mindy Willens filed for a civil harassment restraining order against Anthony Robert D'Amato Jr. — a man who, according to court filings, had spent hours on livestream making death-coded threats, weaponizing the death of her sister, and directing his audience to intimidate her. California law promises a hearing within 21 days. It took over a year.
In this episode, we trace the full timeline of Willens v. D'Amato — from the first continuance to a subpoena demanding her entire YouTube watch history, a hospital excuse for missing court and arrest warrant, and a final settlement that — despite its unconventional form — represents a hard-won and strategically sophisticated outcome.
We also break down why the judge struck some of the enforcement provisions from the signed agreement, attempting to clarify misinformation about the agreement.