#152 - Social Contract Theory: Concerns Everyone
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
How do the foundations of political legitimacy leave people behind? This episode unpacks classic social contract theory through the eyes of contemporary critics to reveal who counts as a full member of the political community and who is written out of justice.
This conversation moves beyond abstract bargaining to ask whether legitimacy built on reciprocity and consent can ever be truly inclusive. We explore the moral and political stakes of shifting from procedural justice to outcome-focused frameworks that prioritize universal rights and real opportunities to thrive.Disclaimer: The information, views, comments, and opinions expressed on Podcast "Talking with AI ML" are generated by artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms. The information, views, comments, and opinions do not reflect the views or positions of the owner/creator(s) or any other party such as but not limited to any past, present, or future employers, organizations, or individuals and are provided for entertainment purposes only. All content provided is for informational and entertainment purposes. The hosts, guests, and contributors (including creator) make no representations as to the accuracy, completeness, suitability, or validity of any information on this Podcast and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its use. This content is used under the doctrine of Fair Use, Public Domain, No Professional Advice, and External Links: The Podcast may contain links to external websites that are not provided or maintained by or in any way affiliated with the Podcast. Please note that the Podcast does not guarantee the accuracy, relevance, timeliness, or completeness of any information on these external websites.
Fair Use: Certain content within the Podcast may be derived from sources that are protected under copyright laws. This content is used under the doctrine of fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law.