『13. The Plastic Spoon in My Brain….』のカバーアート

13. The Plastic Spoon in My Brain….

13. The Plastic Spoon in My Brain….

無料で聴く

ポッドキャストの詳細を見る

このコンテンツについて

I think I’m probably using too much plastic in the kitchen.


Here is some further information

The study was led by Dr. Matthew Campen at the University of New Mexico.

The study analyzed human brain tissue and made the alarming claim that approximately 0.5% of the brain by weight was composed of microplastics, with polyethylene making up roughly 75% of that plastic.


Here is the breakdown of the recycling symbols associated with that plastic and the specific scientific challenges to the study.

1. The Plastic and Its Recycling Symbol

The study identified the dominant plastic as Polyethylene. Since polyethylene comes in two main densities, it is associated with two recycling symbols:

* **#2 HDPE (High-Density Polyethylene): Found in milk jugs, detergent bottles, and shampoo bottles.

* **#4 LDPE (Low-Density Polyethylene): Found in plastic grocery bags, shrink wrap, and squeezable bottles.


Because microplastics degrade and fragment in the environment, the particles found in the body could originate from either source.


Who is Challenging the Study?

Beyond the plastics industry (specifically the American Chemistry Council, which called the study "unnecessarily alarming"), there is a legitimate scientific challenge regarding the methodology used in the study.


The Scientific Critique: "Lipid Interference"


The primary scientific criticism comes from analytical chemists regarding the tool used to measure the plastic, called Pyrolysis Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (Py-GC/MS).

* How it works: This method heats the sample until it decomposes into gas, which is then analyzed to identify chemical signatures.

* The Problem: The human brain is largely made of lipids (fats). When brain fats are heated to high temperatures, they can break down into chemicals (hydrocarbons) that look almost identical to the chemicals produced when polyethylene burns.

* The Argument: Critics argue that the "0.5% by weight" figure may be vastly inflated because the machine might be counting natural brain fats as plastic. They contend that without a different confirmation method (like spectroscopy that uses light rather than heat), it is difficult to distinguish the plastic from the brain's natural fatty tissue.

Summary of Challenges:

* Industry: Claims the study ignores the lack of proven health effects.

* Scientists: Argue the method likely confused brain fats for polyethylene, potentially producing a false positive or an exaggerated weight percentage.

まだレビューはありません