#11: Policing in schools - with Dr. Sebastián Sclofsky
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
このコンテンツについて
Police in schools: safety measure or deeper problem? In this episode, I talk with Dr. Sebastián Sclofsky about random drug searches, school resource officers, and why some policies and practices might do more harm than good.
We discuss:
-Why random searches are often ineffective and what the data really shows
-How carceral logic-surveillance, discipline, and punishment-undermines student trust
-The unintended consequences of “zero tolerance” policies and the school-to-prison pipeline
-What safer, more transformative approaches to education might look like
-The bigger picture: capitalism, state violence, and the myths behind the “war on drugs”
If you’re an educator, parent, or anyone concerned about the future of schools, this episode will challenge the way you think about safety, authority, and trust in education.
More on Dr. Sclofsky:
https://www.sebasclofsky.com
email: jsclofsky@csustan.edu
Chapters
0:00 - Introduction & disclaimers
1:10 - Meeting Dr. Sebastian Sclofsky (and how this episode started)
4:30 - The classroom dog search incident
10:05 - Random searches, effectiveness, and false positives
15:45 - The carceral logic in schools: surveillance, control, and punishment
22:20 - Educational trust vs. policing authority
30:15 - Zero tolerance policies and their consequences
36:40 - The role of teachers, administrators, and counselors
44:10 - Why schools resemble prisons: “cells and bells” design
52:30 - Safe environments vs. punitive discipline
1:00:15 - Parents’ perspectives and the illusion of safety
1:08:40 - War on drugs, individual choice, and systemic issues
1:20:55 - Social trust, democracy, and the role of police
1:30:25 - The school-to-prison pipeline explained
1:39:10 - Can police be agents of social justice?
1:47:00 - Public policy, economics, and community engagement
1:55:45 - Closing thoughts: What schools and society should reconsider