『097 United States v. Askins』のカバーアート

097 United States v. Askins

097 United States v. Askins

無料で聴く

ポッドキャストの詳細を見る

There are very few fact patterns I can see domestic violence taking a back seat to, and yet this case found a way. My interest in this case was two fold. First, I wanted to know how the Army didn't notice that at least 11 blocks of explosives went missing. Second, I wanted to know just how creatively an appellate court could apply the principles of waiver and forfeiture. Unfortunately for all of us, but perhaps most particularly for the inhabitants of Anchorage, I don't really have an explanation for the first issue, only more questions. As to the second, I think CAAF undertook some really fancy footwork to course correct what I perceive to be a misstep by the Army Court of Criminal Appeals, but all without setting down a hard and fast rule for future cases.

For more information on intimate partner violence, I urge you to explore Alliance For Hope and their Family Justice Center Alliance. If you need help finding shelter in your area, please visit DomesticShelters.org. Last, but not least, many law schools and courthouses offer free legal assistance for people seeking protective restraining orders.

I relied on the the ACCA opinion and related materials as well as the CAAF opinion. I'm also sharing a copy of Article 128b of the UCMJ so you can decide if it means anything that subdivision 5 is different than subdivision 1.

Thank you for listening! If you enjoyed this episode, please take a moment to share, rate and review it wherever you hit play today. I'm happy to receive constructive feedback or case suggestions at conductunbecomingpod@gmail.com. Join me over on Instagram @conductunbecoming!

Disclaimer: Conduct Unbecoming is a podcast where I get to talk about interesting crimes and cases that involve US military service members. I research, write, and produce the podcast myself… the opinions expressed are my own and, perhaps it's obvious, Conduct Unbecoming is not approved, endorsed, or authorized by the Department of Defense or whatever name they go by socially now. I am not a military JAG and have never been a military JAG. While I'm a practicing attorney, I don't do direct criminal defense. This podcast is a passion project, not legal advice or expert opinion.

adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません