This episode of Decisions at the Fulcrum starts with the Brandywine River, instead of inventiveness, innovation, or even chemical synthesis. This is an account of how a few generations of refugees taught in European scientific disciplines morphed into an institution much bigger than a company. Instead, this institution gradually became a kind of infrastructure the United States grew to rely on, from the War of 1812 through the First World War due to timing, partnerships, regimen, and the predisposition of an emerging nation that was also unprepared to exert control over its own threats.

Following DuPont's development from gunpowder manufacturer to biochemical organization, this episode explores why nineteenth-century science, grounded in the criteria of reliability, rather than inventiveness, was the primary fulcrum point. Gunpowder was infrastructure in 1802, not an item of goods. Political, tumultuous, and heavy, it revealed the operational vulnerability of American independence. DuPont was the only arrangement that met all of the demands simultaneously but not the most suitable one, as imports failed, domestic producers were insufficient, and government control was still ideologically untenable. When an arrangement solved a shortcoming, despite the fact it was not flawless, the state continued to construct it on that answer. This was not inevitable; rather, it was dependency on the path.

This episode, which speaks directly to a Wilmington audience, contends that DuPont was not a chemistry legend in its entirety by the time of World War I. This recounted a story of how private organizations balance public susceptibility while staying entirely insoluble, and how modern institutions absorb responsibility without absorbing visibility. DuPont's history, from the Brandywine to a world conflict, is not filled with surging patriotism or heroic entrepreneurship, but rather the careful, reliable establishment of stability in an environment that was increasingly realizing how vulnerable it is. Part One of a longer analysis of how empires are subtly constructed on risky theories is presented herein.

A note:

This episode discusses topics that could be close and unsettled for many people. This work isn’t meant as an allusion to events in the present (i.e., the time you listen to it), though the information could be examined in that way. Nothing in this episode is meant to sensationalize harms, minimize dangers, or draw parallels across time. It’s an attempt to understand how societies organize and how decisions persist long after the moment that produced them.

Part II shifts focus from federal legislation to the marketplace, revealing the painful truth that, after years of expansion, the CBD business in 2025 remains fundamentally unstable, poorly regulated, and dominated by bulk isolates and white-label manufacture. Laboratory tests, including JAMA's 2020 review, continue to demonstrate considerable mislabeling, with products having considerably less or significantly more CBD than promised, as well as detectable THC that should not be present in officially compliant hemp.

Against this backdrop, a few companies stand out as exceptions, impressively! With vertically integrated, whole-plant, solvent-free extraction technology, one company called Sunsoil in Vermont shows us that reliability is action, and those activities do the marketing for them. The disparity between what is standard practice and what is necessary for systemic legitimacy is apparent in this case study.

Vertical integration and lab reporting aren't glamorous, but they're remarkable decisions. They are remarkable in that they center their work on quality standards while unintentionally exposing the greater reliance on bulk processing and marketing marshmallows.

Part II looks at Sunsoil as a comparison to demonstrate that CBD's credibility dilemma is the market's current operational situation, and it doesn't have to be this way. Integrity is not a branding effort in this context; it is an organizational decision at the fulcrum.

Part I investigates the federal hinge that enabled today's CBD scenario via a minor provision: Section 7606 of the 2014 Farm Bill.

This section enabled universities and state agricultural agencies to grow hemp for research purposes, unwittingly establishing the first legal road for contemporary cannabinoid study in more than 70 years.

It created the structural circumstances that would ultimately sustain a multibillion-dollar market.

This episode discusses the distinction between legality and legibility.

CBD's early legitimacy was established by clinical data arising from pediatric neurology, including efficacy evidence for Dravet and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. These reports provided a very strong therapeutic signal for cannabinoids in 21st century U.S. medicine, resulting in Epidiolex, the FDA's first cannabis-derived treatment. However, as we'll see in part 2, the scientific data is not broadly understood by the wellness industry.

Part I establishes the foundation: a federal research provision, a scientific signal strong enough to resist regulatory examination, and the ambiguity that would characterize what followed it from 2018 to 2025.

In this episode, we plunge headfirst into calamity from a stormy weather event. Using everything from wandering caribou herds to turbulent typhoons, we delve into how scientists truly forecast the atmosphere and why that process is more chaotic than my sleek weather apps being refreshed in a frenzy.

I explain why contemporary forecasts depend on ensembles—multiple parallel model runs that chart a comprehensive range of possibilities—rather than a singular, overly confident declaration of “it will snow tomorrow.” The episode is also a peek backward at the 2019 Amman “snowstorm that never happened,” when a forecast came to nothing except a downpour of disappointment, closed shops, and some dip in optimism regarding our institutions as a whole. That kicks off a discussion about forecasting and image repair strategies. For image repairs, I am getting into the specifics of crisis communication, looking at what organizations do when a forecast or a quarterly projection or an algorthimic model goes sour. I look at why the reason saying “we meant well” fails to qualify it as an appeal, and why accepting responsibility acknowledging uncertainty is in fact a strength. It’s a matter of building credibility.

I will compare physics-based forecasting techniques in tandem with most recent AI systems, asking why the AI systems fail when it comes to uncommon or exceptionally severe storms—particularly typhoons that make unexpected U-turns as if they left something behind. We dive into the reasons behind AI's tendency to create a misleading aura of confidence, and how that deception can turn perilous when crucial real-world choices: evacuations, closures, and disaster preparedness, all hinge on it.

If you’ve ever questioned the discrepancies in weather predictions, the lack of trust that result from faulty projections, or how extreme storms continually put human beings and technology in a quandary, this segment points out the whole scope of atmospheric ambiguity, with confidence intervals, institutional anxieties, and even the delightful bakery-themed bread runs.

This episode is a recording of an asynchronous lecture/discussion I gave in 2025. I cover the opening narrative in "managing the unexpected" from Karl Weick and Kathleen Sutcliffe. The main theme is how we can comprehend High Reliability Organizations (HROs) using 5 principles. I also look at the airline industry in 2024 as another example. WaMu and the airline collapse in 2024 (as well as the more consequential issues in flight throughout 2025) can comprehensively highlight the five HRO principles: preoccupation with failure, reluctance to simplify, sensitivity to operations, commitment to resilience, and deference to expertise—as decision tools.

Where did WaMu’s early warning signals go? How did simplifications in the lending story obscure real variance on the ground? Who actually had the right to call the shot when it mattered? Think of this as public science for practitioners: a clear, conversational tour of how reliability is designed (or neglected) in complex systems.

By the end, you’ll have a compact diagnostic you can take to your own understanding of organizations: banks, hospital, government, private industry, and national or international coalitions. I hope this talk provides a sense of how "small misses" is a misguided framing when they seem to always turn into colossal failures if they are not managed as though they were consequential from the outset.

the original lecture video: https://youtu.be/cTyNHZc9zkQ

cited work: Weick and Sutcliffe - Managing the Unexpected (2nd edition)

At 4:46 a.m. in Changi Airport, a robot arm known as Ella the Barista is on the job. Behind glass, it grinds, pours, and serves coffee with unwavering precision as a traveler effortlessly pays with a flick of their smartwatch and strides confidently to their gate. From a sleek corner closet-like kiosk of Singapore's award-winning airport, this episode dives into the world of automation: from 1980s Pasadena at Two Panda, with disco spinning robots , Automats and conveyor-belt sushi lines, and the contemporary fry stations and avocado machines in U.S. fast-food chains.

Dr. William Hoffman navigates sensational headlines and gritty truth. White Castle’s Flippy 2 was hailed as a game-changing innovation for 100+ stores, but 2024-2025 SEC filings and trade reports reveal a restricted operation, stopped in their tracks by retrofits, cleaning time, and costly service networks. Chipotle’s Autocado may seem unassuming at first glance, but it offers a case in assigning robots tasks they can excel at without displacing other tasks that build a robust labor force.

The episode dives into why a single kiosk in a meticulously controlled airport is not a blueprint for an entire society, and why equating a 281-square-mile city-state with a federal republic is plainly inept. Rather than bending to “efficient” public relations jumble or sensationalizing “robot takeovers,” the conversation focuses on the less striking realities of robotics: site selection, cleanliness standards, work selections, maintenance duration and oversight scale of operation predict what works, not the design, not the novelty, and never the investment.

The point is that automation operates properly when we sober up and pick a specific task for a robotic tool, create an ideal environment, and set up the infrastructure and oversight for the equipment.

Ella, Flippy, and Autocado explain how strategy, legislation, and everyday unpredictability estimate if robots in food service seamlessly contribute or remain at an impasse.

Notes:

This episode makes limited use of archival audio, advertisements, or public statements for purposes of commentary, critique, and scholarship. These uses fall under the doctrine of fair use as defined by U.S. copyright law (17 U.S.C. § 107). All excerpts are employed selectively and transformatively to support critical analysis, educational inquiry, and public understanding. No commercial gain is derived from their inclusion.

1983 Two Pandas blog entry:

https://paleofuture.com/blog/2023/3/26/you-dont-have-to-give-that-guy-a-tip-video-shows-the-robot-waiter-of-1983-in-action

https://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/world-records/first-restaurant-with-robot-waiting-staff

Reuters video played in episode (2022): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSl8Xyp1kYg

Opening in Beiruit, but it's a simulation. We're going to fly with Middle East Airlines (MEA) in this episode as it implements the socio-technical practice of "safety first" by teaching procedures with accurate communication, collaborative sense, and active monitoring. I discuss MEA's internal program development decision, data collection techniques (documents, interviews, and event narratives), and the importance of considering communication a core competency.

I examine the misguided tendency to want simple and concise narratives. Using the reluctance to simplify principle of high-reliability organizations, I contend that it is preferable to embrace complexity in order to address issues that develop into problems, which in turn become consequential.

Takeaways: State any drift early, design for variety, and avoid the tendency to let convenience stand in for reality.

IMPORTANT: The cockpit dialogue is a non-expert dramatization for educational purposes only. It’s not official phraseology, may omit airline- or country-specific procedures, and should not be used as a reference for flight training or operational decision-making. For aviation guidance, consult certified instructors, company manuals, and regulator publications.

Happy Halloween! 🎃 Candy corn is sweet, triangular, and curiously adamant: a confection that dwells the center of Halloween rituals, from knocking of doors to collecting a sugar surplus. In this episode of Decisions at the Fulcrum we trace candy corn’s journey from factory floors in Philadelphia to the front steps of 1930s and 1950s neighborhoods.

The episode pieces together empirical social science and a sensory chronicle to exhibit how scarcity and everyday exchange drive holiday consumer "preferences".

Subscribe for more episodes where organizational and social decision-making affects everyday routines. Those are shaped by strategic and often surprising moments at fulcrum moments. If you like what you hear, leave a rating or a short review on Podbean; it helps other inquisitive listeners find the show.