『Being Cosmopolitan』のカバーアート

Being Cosmopolitan

A Political Approach

プレビューの再生
期間限定

2か月無料体験

プレミアムプラン無料体験
プレミアムプランを2か月間無料で試す
期間限定:2025年10月14日(日本時間)に終了
2025年10月14日までプレミアムプラン2か月無料体験キャンペーン開催中。詳細はこちら
オーディオブック・ポッドキャスト・オリジナル作品など数十万以上の対象作品が聴き放題。
オーディオブックをお得な会員価格で購入できます。
無料体験後は月額1,500円で自動更新します。いつでも退会できます。

Being Cosmopolitan

著者: Luke Ulas
ナレーター: Graham Mack
プレミアムプランを2か月間無料で試す

無料体験終了後は月額1,500円で自動更新します。いつでも退会できます。

¥1,700 で購入

¥1,700 で購入

このコンテンツについて

What does it mean to be cosmopolitan? Typically, cosmopolitanism is understood as a broad moral orientation, involving some kind of commitment to global moral equality. On this understanding, to be cosmopolitan is simply to evidence that moral orientation oneself. By contrast, Being Cosmopolitan takes up a thoroughly political approach. The focus is on what it might mean, and what it is like, to be political in a distinctly cosmopolitan form. What it means to be cosmopolitan in this thoroughly political sense cannot involve appeal to any particular moral orientation, because politics is about, inter alia, the contestation of such orientations and commitments. Instead, this book offers an account that is based upon the internalization of particular kind of global 'social imaginary', involving the imagination of a global public to which certain issues—or global public affairs—are understood to pertain.

The taking up of this political approach is of significance for the prevailing moral approach. For one thing, many moral cosmopolitans are also themselves possible cosmopolitical actors, and so the elaboration of a political understanding of what it means to be cosmopolitan should act as a spur to the development of a more comprehensive picture of their own subjectivity. More concretely, being cosmopolitan in the political sense has important implications that are not readily observable when concentrating purely upon developing moral cosmopolitan claims. Within which kind of global order is it possible, or comfortable, for a cosmopolitical agent to live? In answer to this question, the book argues against the viability of both a world of self-determining peoples, and of 'pluralist' global visions—both of which are popular with moral cosmopolitan theorists. Furthermore, a focus on cosmopolitical subjectivity can help us to better understand the predicaments of real-world global politics. Not all political cosmopolitans are moral cosmopolitans. Therefore, a world of cosmopolitans is not necessarily any kind of singular 'moral community'. Indeed, as Being Cosmopolitan will endeavour to show, even amongst those who do share the core moral cosmopolitan commitment to the moral equality of all, mutual unintelligibility can arise.

©2025 Luke Ulas (P)2025 Highbridge Audio
哲学 政治・政府 政治学 歴史 歴史・理論
まだレビューはありません