Why Investors Say "We Don't Back Solo Founders" (And What They Mean)
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
About 65% of high-potential startups that fail die from co-founder conflict. Julian, who spent seven years matching co-founders before starting Solo Founders, answers the six questions people ask most about going solo: do you need a co-founder, is it as lonely as it sounds, who has actually done it, how do you raise money alone, do solo founders fail more, and what is "solo founder syndrome."
Topics covered:
- Solo founder vs co-founder: raise the bar; don't settle for a co-founder of convenience
- Why ~65% of startup failures trace to the founding team, and what that means if you're solo
- Loneliness as the solo founder's real failure mode, and "solo, together" as the fix
- Famous solo founders past and present: eBay, Dell, Zoom, Browserbase, WorkOS, Loyal, Polsia
- Fundraising alone: the pass as an easy out; investors reading your talent bar through your hires
- The dilution advantage: optimizing for investor quality over valuation
- The denominator delusion: the base-rate error behind "solo founders fail more"
- "Solo founder syndrome," debunked
Host: Julian Weisser, founder of Solo Founders; previously co-founded On Deck (ODF), where he ran the largest co-founder-matching program in tech for seven years.
The State of Solo Founding report: https://solofounders.com/report
65% figure: Noam Wasserman, The Founder's Dilemmas (Harvard Business School)