The center of gravity (CG) of a golf club is a fundamental law of physics, not a marketing concept. It is a three-dimensional point inside the clubhead where the entire mass is effectively concentrated. CG is determined solely by mass distribution and geometry, and it directly influences launch, spin, stability, and forgiveness.

CG is not a visible mark on the clubface. What matters is how mass is positioned vertically, front-to-back, and heel-to-toe. Clubs with identical volume can perform very differently if their shapes distribute mass differently.

Vertical CG (High or Low)
A lower CG increases launch angle and improves results on off-center strikes. In irons, moving mass rearward naturally lowers CG because the rear structure sits closer to the sole. This benefits players who need help launching the ball higher.

Front-to-Back CG (Forward or Rearward)CG depth controls spin and forgiveness. In drivers, CG sits closer to the face because the face and hosel are thicker and heavier than the crown. A forward CG reduces spin, while a rearward CG increases stability but adds spin. In irons, cavity-back designs place CG farther back than blades, improving forgiveness.

Heel-to-Toe CG (Lateral)Lateral mass distribution affects face rotation and shot shape. Draw or fade bias is a physical outcome of CG placement combined with moment of inertia, not a simple adjustment.

Geometry Over VolumeCG follows geometry, not size. A deep-faced driver and a shallow, wide driver can have the same volume but very different CG locations and performance. In irons, moving mass backward also moves it downward due to structural constraints.

Measurement and DesignBefore CAD, CG was measured by balancing the clubhead on a narrow point from multiple orientations to find intersecting balance planes. This method worked for irons but failed for drivers due to curved shapes. Modern manufacturers now rely on CAD for precise CG calculation.

Loft and Visual IllusionBecause clubfaces are angled, CG appears higher on the face than it truly is. Surface projections are misleading; performance depends on the true three-dimensional CG inside the clubhead.

ConclusionCG is an unavoidable result of mass distribution and geometry. There is no universally “perfect” CG—only one that matches a golfer’s swing dynamics, speed, and delivery. Understanding CG in three dimensions is essential for club fitting and performance.

• www.Golf247.eu