Ep 345 | There are Levels to This
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
このコンテンツについて
CEO coaching impact at Rydel → ex-CEO facilitator drove future-only focus, defined 8 KCIs tied to a 2031 revenue goal; owners present progress tomorrow
Org alignment → mitigate siloed thinking as team scales (3 → 120 relationships), assign single-threaded KCI owners, and demand outcome-focused, data-backed cases
Marketing leadership → new head prioritizes reliable data, base ad-spend momentum, and annual ROI thinking; December 19 staffing gap forces ad budget decision
Alternative considered → split stations but run between each to simulate fatigue; consensus leans to true solo baselines first
Capability clarifications → Amer can complete 1,000m ski/row by pacing vs intervals; confidence-building needed via measured tests
Role split in race → teams rarely go 50/50; align to strengths (e.g., sled push load feasibility), and choreograph transitions together
Performance goals → stretch: top 25; sub-60 min likely unrealistic given current run pace; use Ottawa trial to set aggressive but real targets
Ottawa trial → Feb 15 in-person dry run to test pacing, transitions, and failure points safely; highest learning ROI vs individual practice
Pairing model → Adel matched with retired ex-CEO (Crayola/Hallmark) via profile of stage, personality, and challenges; 2 full-day team sessions/year
Facilitation craft → future-only framing with explicit yes from each attendee; redirected any past-focused remarks on the spot; met 1:1 at lunch to vent/close loops
Talk-time split → ~25% facilitator, 75% team; brief teaching blocks (~20 min) + moderated discussion
Intake & agenda → anonymous prework surfaced strengths/weaknesses → day focused on defining top initiatives to “deserve” 2031 revenue goal
KCI outcome → group debated 17 → 8 KCIs; each KCI has a single owner accountable for orchestration across silos; progress review meeting is tomorrow
Decision hygiene → facilitator stayed neutral, pressed for objective business value, and required owners to translate passion into cross-functional outcomes
Relationship explosion → management grew from 3 to 16; interaction lines grew 3 → 120 (N*(N−1)/2) → more conflict/coord needs
Whole-thinking lens → consider each object’s relationships to all others, not only “my function vs the thing”
Meeting mechanism → everyone pitches priority initiatives; group selects few; single owner quarterbacks cross-functional execution
Strong-but-timid ideas → owners expected to self-advocate; light prompting on outcomes; “natural selection” if the case lacks clarity
Emotional spikes → facilitator acknowledged care, insisted on translation to business value; did not match energy; kept room grounded
Hiring journey → struggled to find autonomous marketing owner; new leader from a different industry is working due to depth on metrics + ownership
Data discipline → focus on fewer, reliable, raw data points that tell a coherent city/trade/lead-cost story; avoid noisy inferred metrics
Spend momentum → maintain base ad spend in off-season to preserve algorithm learning; annual ROI > monthly; educate franchisees at network scale
Stakes ↑ → guidance affects 30+ owners; requires taking stands with clear why
Seasonal wrinkle → Dec 19–early Jan sales capacity near-zero; must adjust ad budgets to avoid unserviceable lead inventory vs losing algo momentum
Project management gap → difficulty isolating bottlenecks from noise; risk of over-involvement; needs sharper owners, milestones, scorecards, comp linkage
Solver addiction → urge to fix everything reduces team self-advocacy; practicing boundaries to let owners own outcomes
Definitions matter → deepen rigor on integrity, responsibility, accountability; “how” now outweighs “what” at scale
Identity vs results → over-attached to monthly sales; learning to accept short-term dips to grow managers and systems
Anxiety management → hired PA (Ben) for 2–3 hrs/week as prioritization sounding board; structured check-ins, guided questions, RICE scoring to de-conflict urgency vs impact