A Spy of Rotterdam
Erasmus Between Wisdom and Folly
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
聴き放題対象外タイトルです。Audibleプレミアムプラン登録で、非会員価格の30%OFFで購入できます。
¥2,500 で購入
-
ナレーター:
-
Brian Roesel
-
著者:
-
Boris Kriger
概要
Erasmus of Rotterdam is usually remembered as a gentle humanist, a champion of learning, moderation, and civilized reform. This book proposes a more unsettling and far more compelling portrait. A Spy of Rotterdam: Erasmus Between Wisdom and Folly presents Erasmus not as a harmless moralist or a failed revolutionary, but as a uniquely positioned observer who survived one of Europe’s most violent intellectual ruptures by mastering the art of influence without allegiance.
Moving freely among popes, princes, reformers, scholars, and printers, Erasmus spoke with extraordinary candor while avoiding destruction in an age when words routinely led to exile, imprisonment, or death. He mocked authority without renouncing it, exposed corruption without embracing rupture, and defended education and irony at a moment when Europe was rapidly losing both. His famous Praise of Folly appears here not as a playful satire, but as a sophisticated instrument of encrypted critique—laughter used as armor, irony as a means of survival.
This book follows Erasmus through the fractures of his time, revealing how his caution was not weakness, but intelligence; how his ambiguity was not evasion, but a deliberate epistemic position. Standing between wisdom and folly, faith and reason, reform and loyalty, Erasmus emerges as a thinker who understood that clarity can become cruelty, that truth spoken without restraint may destroy what it seeks to save, and that sometimes the most radical act is to remain visible without becoming captured.
Written with philosophical rigor and historical sensitivity, A Spy of Rotterdam speaks directly to the modern reader living in an age of polarization, surveillance, and moral absolutism. It asks an uncomfortable question that has lost none of its urgency: how does one think freely, speak honestly, and remain human when certainty itself has become dangerous?