The Tickle v Giggle Ruling Explained | Sall Grover (Part 1)
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
Sall Grover returns to discuss the latest ruling in the Tickle v Giggle case after the Full Bench of the Federal Court upheld the original decision and increased damages against her.
We discuss:
• Why the court ruled that excluding a male from a women-only app was unlawful discrimination
• The shift from indirect to direct discrimination
• Whether Australia’s Sex Discrimination Act now treats “woman” as a mixed-sex category
• The implications for women-only spaces, sport, services, and law
• The role of the Australian Human Rights Commission
• The ABC’s framing of the case as a victory for both “trans and women’s rights”
• Why this case has become one of the defining cultural and legal debates in Australia
This is Part 1 of a two-part conversation.
CROWD FUND LINK: https://gigglecrowdfund.com/PREVIOUS INTERVIEWS
Part 1: https://youtu.be/2RN7EDXL_7E?si=Ds4vzrM9AiaiMnUG
Part 2: https://youtu.be/2RN7EDXL_7E?si=tWpjBQyJGzl9m77c
ABC article discussed: https://www.abc.net.au/religion/giggle-for-girls-v-tickle-judgement-good-trans-womens-rights/106694548
FOLLOW SALL GROVER
X: https://x.com/salltweets
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/sallsfacebook
FOLLOW MONICA LEWIS
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@quitefranklyofficial
Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4n4YedUxEjO7X6lpMSvThD?si=51c658de52ce4f20
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/quitefranklypodcast/?hl=en
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@quitefranklypod
X: https://x.com/quitefranklyau
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61584616214800