The 60% Rule for Moral Choices
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
The 60% Rule for Moral Choices
-
ナレーター：
-
著者：
Send us Fan Mail
In this episode, the hosts will explore the weight of making moral choices when outcomes are inherently unknowable. Drawing from your manuscript, they will delve into:
The Galileo Dilemma: How he navigated the ethical tension between sharing a disruptive truth and challenging established religious and scientific orthodoxy.
Moral Heuristics: A discussion on the mental shortcuts we use for ethical evaluation, referencing Jonathan Haidt’s "righteous mind" and Gerd Gigerenzer’s insights on gut feelings as practical wisdom.
Modern Ethical Frontiers: The trade-offs between innovation speed and safety in Artificial Intelligence (citing Wendell Wallach) and the real-time moral calculations made during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The Burden of the Manhattan Project: A look at J. Robert Oppenheimer and the profound responsibility scientists face when working with incomplete knowledge of their creations' consequences.
Reflective Conviction: The importance of "reflective conviction"—confidence tempered by the humility to revise one’s path as new information emerges.
The 60% Rule: The central takeaway that we are 100% responsible for our choices, even when we only have 60% of the data.
Support the show