『Esophagogastric Malignancies』のカバーアート

Esophagogastric Malignancies

Esophagogastric Malignancies

無料で聴く

ポッドキャストの詳細を見る

このコンテンツについて

 Clinical Pathway for Upper GI Malignancies: A Guide for Gastroenterology FellowsIntroductionThis document provides a comprehensive, evidence-based clinical pathway for the diagnosis, staging, treatment, and surveillance of the three primary upper GI malignancies encountered in our practice: esophageal cancer, gastric adenocarcinoma, and gastric lymphoma. The goal of this guide is to establish a clear, logical framework for clinical decision-making, offering a structured approach suitable for a fellow-in-training. By mastering these pathways, you will be equipped to navigate the complexities of upper GI oncology, from initial presentation to long-term follow-up, ensuring optimal patient care.1.0 Initial Evaluation and Diagnosis of Suspected Upper GI MalignancyThe clinical pathway for any upper GI malignancy begins when a patient presents with alarm symptoms that raise suspicion for a significant underlying pathology. While the specific cancer type will dictate subsequent management, the foundational step for all suspected upper GI malignancies is direct endoscopic visualization and, critically, tissue acquisition to establish a definitive histologic diagnosis.Common alarm symptoms that should trigger an oncologic workup include:Progressive dysphagia (difficulty swallowing)Odynophagia (painful swallowing)Unintentional weight lossIron deficiency anemiaHematemesis (vomiting blood)Early satietyThe primary and unequivocal first-line diagnostic test is an Upper Endoscopy (EGD) with biopsy. This procedure serves two core purposes: first, to confirm the histologic subtype of the malignancy (e.g., adenocarcinoma vs. squamous cell carcinoma vs. lymphoma), and second, to precisely map the lesion's location and gross appearance. Once a histologic diagnosis is confirmed, the clinical pathway diverges based on the specific cancer type.2.0 Esophageal Cancer PathwayThe management of esophageal cancer is critically dependent on accurate locoregional staging. The results of the staging workup directly dictate the therapeutic approach, determining whether the most appropriate strategy will be endoscopic resection, surgical intervention, or a palliative course. The two primary histologic subtypes have distinct risk factor profiles, which are essential to recognize.Esophageal Adenocarcinoma:Typical Location: Distal EsophagusKey Risk Factors: Barrett's esophagus Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) Obesity Smoking Male sex, White raceEsophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC):Typical Location: Upper/Mid EsophagusKey Risk Factors: Smoking Alcohol Consumption Achalasia (Classic 'board' association; note that modern data also show a link to adenocarcinoma due to stasis and inflammation) Caustic Injury Plummer-Vinson syndrome Tylosis HPV infection2.1 Staging ProtocolThe staging algorithm for esophageal cancer follows a precise, sequential order designed to first assess local invasion and then evaluate for distant spread.Diagnosis: The process begins with EGD with Biopsy to confirm the presence and type of malignancy.Locoregional Staging: An Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) ± Fine-Needle Aspiration (FNA) is performed next. EUS is the best modality for assessing the depth of tumor invasion (T stage) and the involvement of regional lymph nodes (N stage).Systemic Staging: A CT of the Chest/Abdomen and a PET/CT scan are then utilized to detect any distant metastasis (M stage) in organs like the liver, lungs, or bone.Specialized Assessment: If the tumor is located near the carina or proximal airway, a Bronchoscopy is indicated to evaluate for direct invasion into the airway.Critical Staging Distinction: A common "board trap" is to confuse the staging order between esophageal and gastric cancer. For esophageal cancer, EUS is performed before CT/PET. The primary decision point is local resectability, which is best determined by assessing the T and N stages with EUS.2.2 Treatment by StageThe treatment plan is directly guided by the final TNM stage.Tis (High-Grade Dysplasia) & T1a (Mucosal Invasion) The standard of care is Endoscopic Therapy. The choice between methods depends on lesion characteristics:Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR): Small, well-circumscribed lesions (<20 mm)Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD): Larger (>20 mm), flat, or diffuse lesions requiring en bloc resectionT1b (Submucosal Invasion) The standard-of-care and definitive "board answer" is Esophagectomy. This is due to the rich lymphatic network in the submucosa, which carries a significant risk (~30%) of nodal metastasis that cannot be addressed endoscopically. It is important to note that in highly specialized centers, select low-risk sm1 lesions (invading <500 μm into the submucosa) may be considered for endoscopic therapy.Locally Advanced (≥T2 or N+) The standard approach for resectable, locally advanced disease is multimodal. This involves Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation (e.g., the CROSS regimen) to downstage the tumor, followed by ...
まだレビューはありません