『Ep 332 | Nuclear Bunkers』のカバーアート

Ep 332 | Nuclear Bunkers

Ep 332 | Nuclear Bunkers

無料で聴く

ポッドキャストの詳細を見る

このコンテンツについて

Here’s a summary of the conversation

Big questions & themes

  • How much ethical responsibility should ultra-large owners (e.g., Rockefeller then, Bezos now) bear for actions taken by distant agents or employees? Scale makes direct control impossible, so culpability is murky.

  • Judging historical “robber barons” by modern standards is tricky; industrialization also delivered massive societal benefits (railroads, wartime production capacity).

  • Amazon is held up as dramatically improving consumer welfare (especially for the poor) via lower prices and strong service, while critics cite worker treatment, monopoly power, and harm to small businesses.

Labor vs. capital, unions, and management

  • Core debate: unions as necessary counterweight when management fails vs. unions creating “unworkability” that drives capital and jobs away (Detroit cited as cautionary tale). Costco is praised as a high-wage, high-retention alternative model.

  • Employer tactics to tilt the bargain ethically: example of a company buying employees’ vehicles (tax-efficient, lowers risk for workers, boosts retention/switching costs).

  • Broader historical lens: serfs vs. slaves, incentives for care and productivity, and how modern safety nets (welfare/healthcare) parallel older community/Church supports. Stoic anecdotes (Epictetus) surface around dignity and perception.

Philanthropy & legacy

  • Carnegie’s Gospel of Wealth, vanity vs. anonymous giving, and building “Costco-like” efficiency in philanthropy (e.g., modern academies/foundations) as a model for high-leverage charity.

Investing, Bitcoin, and risk

  • Investing philosophy favors cash-generative, mispriced assets over non-productive “greater-fool” bets. Deep-value plays can be incredible on paper but hinge on fraud risk and management quality.

  • Bitcoin: skepticism despite multiple near-miss chances; best pro-BTC case framed as asymmetric payoff vs. zero, but dismissed as a gambling instrument. Includes a tragic anecdote about an early holder who sold, missed the upside, and later died by suicide (mentioned briefly without detail).

Personal/closing notes

  • Reflections on reputation, how people judge with limited info, and trying to align business incentives with personal values and community. Light closing chatter about upcoming travel.


まだレビューはありません